Since 1987 Stan J. Caterbone has been a prisoner and enemy of the state. ISC was a Department of Defense (DOD) Contractor and a partner with United States Intelligence Agencies since it's beginings in the early 1970's. One of it's first contracts was Project X with the National Security Agency or NSA of Ft. Meade, Maryland.
In 1987 ISC completed the merger with the 3rd largest defense contractor of Great Britain, Ferranti International; who paid $1 billion dollars for ISC and all of it's subsidiaries.
ABC News/Financial Times aired 3 episodes on ABC Nightline with Ted Koppel regarding the ISC/CIA defense weapons; technologies; and cluster bombs to Iraq story and lead into the allegations that then nominee for the Director of CIA Robert Gates was involved with ISC and the selling of arms to Iraq.
ABC News 20/20 aired a story on the ISC/CIA efforts to sell cluster bombs to Saadam Hussein and Iraq on February 1, 1991 days after the start of the Persian Gulf War I, with the initial bombing raid destroying a cluster bomb factory built in Iraq by Carlos Cardoen.
In Clark v. Guerin (CI-1990-0074 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas), Lancaster Attorney Joseph Roda represented William Clark, ISC's in-house legal counsel, and never mentioned any conflict to Stan J. Caterbone in 1987.
In Clark v. Guerin (CI-1990-0074 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas), James Guerin deposited $1.75 million dollars into an escrow account at Fulton Bank, Lancaster, County.
In Clark v. Guerin (CI-1990-0074 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas), Christopher Underhill of Harman, Underhill & Brubaker, represented James Guerin. In 2005 Christopher Underhill represented the Manheim Township Police Department (05-cv-2288 U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania) CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al.,
Not only did the allegations of fraud within ISC have to be silenced at a time when merger negotiations were ongoing with Ferranti, but all of the fraud; extortion; public corruption; burglaries; civil rights violations; anti-trust and intellectual property right violations; lender liability torts; false arrests; false imprisonments; as well as other civil and criminal activities had to be covered up and buried in bureaucratic red tape. Information and findings are still being uncovered and discovered to this day. Contrary to popular belief, up until 1996 a grand jury investigation into ISC was still ongoing. It is not known whether it has closed or not. All of these activates constitute a RICO crime due to the pattern and organization of the perpetrators. The pattern and source of the activities can be traced back to 1987, with subgroups changing over time, but still engaging in the same practices. The following plan of action was followed in order to perpetrate the cover-up:
Totally discredit Stan(ley) J. Caterbone and any and all allegations in every way possible.
Always keep attorneys and anyone remotely involved with the legal community away at times when efforts for justice are pursued.
When attempts to enter the U.S. legal system arise, isolate, harass, and extort any monies and/or possessions of value.
Change the history of events and the truth.
THE COURTS AND THE UNITED STATES LEGAL SYSTEM
For eighteen years, (from 1987 until 2005) it has always been fairly easy to keep these issues from court dockets and judges. During these years Stan J. Caterbone had solicited at least twenty attorneys, some from large firms with national recognition in their respective fields of specialties. Attorneys from New York City to Santa Barbara and San Diego California were visited and consulted as well as a group of ex FBI agents who specialized in white collar crime that are now globally recognized. However, the money and influence of persons and entities that wanted these issues silence always prevailed. The issues were so complex and convoluted, and involved such high profile politicians and U.S. agencies, it was far easier to state that there was no case, or their were no claims that would result in remedy or redress. Between the Republican Party and the Department of Defense, the CIA and the NSA, there was not an attorney that could not be influenced. The obstruction of justice and due process in this case is most likely unprecedented in nature and in malice.
However in 2005 that all changed when Stan J. Caterbone appeared as a pro se litigant representing himself, without any counsel, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania in CATERBONE v. The Lancaster County Prison, et. al., or case no. 05-cv-2288. This case is still not settled and has been withdrawn by plaintiff Stan J. Caterbone in October of 2008 after a successful ruling in the U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals (07-4474) in September of 2008. The case will be continued upon the security of evidence and the cease and desist of obstruction of justice and due process. On May 16, 2005 at the Federal Courthouse in Philadelphia, Stan J. Caterbone filed the case under seal. One week later in the United States Bankruptcy Court for Eastern Pennsylvania in Reading, Pennsylvania, again appearing as pro se, Stan J. Caterbone filed a petition for protection under the Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Code, in case no. 05-23059.
These acts of entering the United States legal system with these issues triggered yet another round of attempts to keep these cases from the courts and judges - Organized Stalking with Directed Energy Devices and Weapons, built on a foundation of mental telepathy or total Mind Control.
REMOTE VIEWING; ORGANIZED STALKING; DIRECTED ENERGY DEVICES AND WEAPONS. Oranized stalking and harassment began in 1987 following the public allegations of fraud within ISC. This organized stalking and harassment was enough to drive an ordinary person to suicide. As far back as the late 1980's Stan J. Caterbone knew that his mind was being read, or "remotely viewed". This was verified and confirmed when information only known to him, and never written, spoken, or typed, was repeated by others. In 1998, while soliciting the counsel of Philadelphia attorney Christina Rainville, (Rainville represented Lisa Michelle Lambert in the Laurie Show murder case), someone introduced the term remote viewing through an email. That was the last time it was an issue until 2005. The term was researched, but that was the extent of the topic. Remote Viewers may have attempted to connect in a more direct and continuous way without success.
In 2005 the U.S. sponsored mind control turned into an all-out assault of mental telepathy; synthetic telepathy; and pain and torture through the use of directed energy devices and weapons that usually fire a low frequency electromagnetic energy at the targeted victim. This assault was no coincidence in that it began simultaneously with the filing of the federal action in U.S. District Court, or CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al., or 05-cv-2288. This assault began after the handlers remotely trained Stan J. Caterbone with mental telepathy. The main difference opposed to most other victims of this technology is that Stan J. Caterbone is connected 24/7 with a person who declares that she is Interscope recording artist Sheryl Crow of Kennett Missouri. Stan J. Caterbone has spent 3 years trying to validate and confirm this person without success. Most U.S. intelligence agencies refuse to cooperate, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the U.S. Attorney's Office refuse to comment. See attached documents for more information.
In 2006 or the beginning of 2007 Stan J. Caterbone began his extensive research into mental telepathy; mind control technologies; remote viewing; and the CIA mind control program labeled MK ULTRA and it's subprograms.
FAMILY HISTORY If you listen to the propaganda machine and the community of Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, including professionals, the family history of Stan J. Caterbone goes something like the following:
Father, Samuel Caterbone, Jr., Schizophrenic who ran out on his family because of nervous breakdowns while trying to run a small dry cleaning business. He traveled the world looking for the Blessed Mother Mary and Space Aliens. He ended up living in government subsidized housing broke and with a severe mental illness.
Brother, Samuel A. Caterbone, suffered from the very same illness has his father, Schizophrenia, who finally killed himself trying to live in California.
Brother, Thomas W. Caterbone, suffered from the very same mental illness as his brother, Stan J., Bipolar Mood Disorder, who ran a lawn business and finally committed suicide at an early age.
Stan J. Caterbone, suffered from Bipolar Mood Disorder, or Manic Depression and had a nervous breakdown in 1987 trying to compete in the financial services industry. When he has his nervous breakdowns, he always threatens to sue everyone in court and is deeply paranoid in thinking the whole world is against him. He always spends all of his money during his fits of mania and has delusions about his success as a businessman.
The Family History was formulated back in the 1960's when Samuel Caterbone, Jr., father of Stan J. Caterbone, became engaged in a black budget mind control program that began during his service in the United States Navy as a radioman and air gunner. Samuel Caterbone, Jr., was most likely a direct product of MK ULTRA or one of it's subprograms. His brother, Samuel A. Caterbone, was most likely part of the LSD experiments of MK ULTRA. Stan J. Caterbone is most likely part of a program sponsored by the Department of Defense Agencies, such as DARPA or the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA). The facts of Stan J. Caterbone's intimate discussions with both his father and brother over the years before they died, the totality of documents that were preserved in thier estate, including service records; letters; official court papers; high school documents; and the like - all will prove that they were in fact part of MK ULTRA or one of it's subprograms. The following are the facts and the real record of the family history:
Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., (Father) served in the Navy from 1943 to 1946 and graduated with honors from Air Gunners School in Jacksonville, Florida. He was an exceptional student/athlete while attending Lancaster Catholic High School, participating in the band as well as sports. He was also his senior class secretary/treasurer. After the Navy, he went on to build a successful dry cleaning business, which he is credited with inventing a filtration system for the solvents. He also developed a very good investment in real estate along the Manheim Pike, owning several properties. By his own writings and from his personal accounts to me, he was definitely a remote viewer for some U.S. Agency with telepathic abilities. His viewing is documented to have begun back in the early 1970's. He also suffered from organized stalking, and was considered an enemy and prisoner of the state. Back in the 1960's, he was a world traveler, this is documented by his passports. Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., may have been a covert carrier for someone in intelligence. Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., had his mental health history laced with electro shock therapy. Electro Shock Therapy Experiments is another subprogram of MK ULTRA. In addition, and especially disturbing is his criminal record with the Lancaster City Police Department and the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas. In 1973 Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr. was convicted of forging a 2 checks from the Caterbone Cleaners, Inc., checking account. The one check to Joe the Motorists Store at the Manor Shopping Center was never entered into evidence, it was for a total of $70.00. The other check was made out to Lancaster Attorney James Coho for $200.00 with "divorce proceedings" written in the memo. This was his only criminal record. Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., was sentenced to one year probation by President Judge William Johnstone. However, on August 29, 1973 after nine months, Judge Johnstone wrote an ORDER releasing him from probation and ordering him to "leave the vicinity of the County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania". The President Judge of Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas literally threw my father out of Lancaster County for forging 2 checks from his own corporation. In 1987 I was arrested for stealing my own files from my own company, Financial Management Group, Ltd., You can research the life of Candy Jones and Kate O'Brien to learn more on this topic. Samuel Caterbone, Jr., has left enough writings and documentation to know that his life fits the model for targeted individuals, complete with economic ruin, isolation, disenfranchised from family and friends, and of course a fabricated mental illness history. You can view most of his record online.
Samuel A. Caterbone, (Brother) served in the United States Air Force in 1968 to 1970. In 1991, Stan J. Caterbone accused the United States Government of using his brother, Samuel A. Caterbone for part of the LSD experiments on mind control, or MK ULTRA. A notarized letter of October 23, 1991 was sent certified mail to the California Attorney General on the subject matter, with a return letter from the California Attorney General on January 14, 1992. By his own admission before his death, Samuel A. Caterbone disclosed to Stan J. Caterbone of the "bad LSD" trips while in the Air Force. Since his death of December 25, 1984, Stan J. Caterbone and others questioned the classification of suicide, and made allegations of foul play that was ultimately responsible for his death. Finally in a meeting in Santa Barbara, California with the Santa Barbara Public Guardian's Office, an office admitted that the death was more likely due to foul plan than suicide. Samuel A. Caterbone was also an exceptional student and athlete while attending Lancaster Catholic High School. After playing varsity football as a sophomore, he had an unfortunate accident while deer hunting the following November. While in the woods in Bellefonte, Pennsylvania, his hunting pants caught fire trying to stay warm. It left him in the Lancaster General Hospital for months, going through painful skin grafts and isolation. The hunting accident interrupted his athletic career and scared his legs for life. The Schizophrenia diagnosis was a combination of LSD flashbacks and organized stalking and harassment.
Thomas P. Caterbone, (Brother) had an unfortunate transaction at Fulton Bank that set a course of action that resulted in a suicide. Although diagnosed with Bipolar Disease and Manic Depression -- embezzled and extorted monies were most likely the reason for his suicide in 1996. Fulton Bank was involved in a fraud that took $72,000 from a real estate settlement closing and lead to his total financial ruin and collapse in June of 1995. The funds were never recovered and Fulton Bank is a defendant for a wrongful death claim in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania in CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al., 05-cv-2288. FULTON BANK triggered a severe and lethal death blow to Thomas P. Caterbone, and as of this day has refused to acknowledge any wrongdoing or remorse. Thomas P. Caterbone was also an exceptional athlete. Playing for Lancaster Catholic High School, Franklin and Marshall College, the Harrisburg Patriots, and even the Philadelphia Eagles. Tom also coached football at J.P. McCaskey and Franklin and Marshall College. Thomas P. Caterbone had a very successful lawn and landscaping business before joining forces with John DePatto of United Financial Services and selling residential mortgages. John DePatto was the former head of Parent Bank, owned by James Guerin and ISC. Parent Bank, owned by ISC also foreclosed on 2323 New Danville Pike, Conestoga, Pennsylvania in 1988, which was owned by Stan J. Caterbone. Thousands of dollars of equity was extorted in the process, despite still being short sold for a profit to Mr. Keith Kirchner, an executive of Lancaster Newspapers and former graduate of Lancaster Catholic High School.
Stan J. Caterbone is a remote viewer, is telepathic, and a federal whistleblower with an exceptional entrepreneurial record in spite of all of his adversaries and their assaults. In spite of the U.S. Sponsored mind control and torture, he has endured and will prevail. Legally, Stan J. Caterbone has been able to preserve his claims, and progress his legal challenges and claims through both the federal and state court system appearing pro se, without the aid or expense of additional legal counsel. Some of his claims and briefs will most likely be landmark decisions in years to come. Stan J. Caterbone was a 2-Sport MVP at Lancaster Catholic High School, in both football and track. Stan J. Caterbone never received less than a B grade in his four years of high school and had an 87+ average. Stan J. Caterbone excelled in computer technologies, taking his first full term course in 1975, while in high school and continuing into college at Millersville University, graduating with a degree in business administration in 1980. Stan J. Caterbone excelled profoundly at building his companies, first beginning with Financial Management Group, Ltd., then working with Tony Bongiovi of Power Station Studios and the "Digital Movie"; then building Advanced Media Group, Ltd.. Over the years, despite the illegal seizures and foreclosures, Stan J. Caterbone has amassed a portfolio of impressive real estate deals that have always paid off in profits, no matter how or when they were sold. The same was true of his businesses. Financial Management Group, Ltd., was a $20,000 dollar investment in 1986 and was still sold for approximately $100,000 two years later, despite the false arrests and the extortion of most of it's real value and equity.
The mental health history and the criminal records were completely fabricated, and a close review and investigation into the actual court records and hospital records can prove that in very short fashion. There are TWO (2) ways to quickly dispute the Mental Health History and Record:
One - Review the word "Delusional; delusions; etc.,; every instance of the word used by mental health professionals, and the false reports by friends and family were associated with facts, and matters of the official record, the complete opposite of the meaning of the word "delusional". And they still exist to this very day.
Two - Review the 3 Fabricated Suicide Allegations of the following dates: August 10(?), 1987 at Burdette Tomlin Hospital (Cape May County New Jersey); February 18th(?), 2005 by Kerry Egan and the Southern Regional Police Department; and July 19, 2009 for the 302 Commitment by the Lancaster City Police Department at Lancaster General Hospital.
The Criminal Record is very similar, since 1987 Stanley J. Caterbone has had 31 false arrests; formal charges and convictions dismissed prior to court proceedings or won on summary appeals in the County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania; most of which Stan J. Caterbone appearing as pro se (representing himself). These have resulted in civil complaints filed in 2008 in CATERBONE v. The County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
THE PUBLIC RECORD The Public Record is comprised of court filings and exhibits in U.S. Federal Courts; Pennsylvania State Courts; and the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas. In all some 40,000 pages of documents are now filed and electronically scanned or microfilmed in prothonotary offices. In addition in both the U.S. Federal Courts and the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas there are more than 11 hours of audio recordings; some 3,000 scanned images; and several video broadcasts of the ISC News broadcasts all stored on a CD-ROM and filed as an exhibit to some of the law suits filed by Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group, as plaintiffs. Stan J. Caterbone has over 100 court docket sheet numbers in federal, state, and local courts.
There are also Pennsylvania Unemployment Compensation records; Department of Welfare and Lancaster County Assistance Office records; Local Real Estate Tax records; Lancaster County Tax Assessment records; Social Security Administration Benefits records; Lancaster Catholic High School transcripts; Millersville University transcripts; all for Stan J. Caterbone, in addition to his court filings.
For Samuel A. Caterbone, my brother, there are United States Air Force service records; Lancaster Catholic High School transcripts; Millersville University transcripts; Social Security Administration records; Santa Barbara County Guardian and Public Defender records; and papers and documents persevered from his estate.
For Samuel P. Caterbone, my father, there are United States Naval records, Lancaster Catholic High School transcripts; Social Security Administration records; Lancaster County Assistance Office records; Local Real Estate Tax records; Lancaster County Tax Assessment records; Samuel Caterbone Cleaners, Inc., corporate records; Real Estate Deeds and Mortgages; Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas civil and criminal records; and of course papers and documents persevered from his estate
PUBLIC WEBSITE ADDRESSES OF INTEREST: WWW.AMGGLOBALENTERTAINMENTGROUP.COM WWW.ADVANCEDMEDIAGROUP.WORDPRESS.COM WWW.ADVANCEDMEDIAGROUPRESEARCH.WORDPRESS.COM WWW.ADVANCEDMEDIAGROUP.YOUTUBE.COM WWW.FREEDOMFFCHS.COM WWW.AMGGLOBALENTERTAINMENTGROUP.COM/NEW DOCUMENT LIBRARY
DOCUMENTS ATTACHED FOR REVIEW (Available in the Printed Version) ** It is important to note that as of this writing, Remote Viewing has recently been commercialized by corporate America, and certain Fortune 500 companies are using Remote Viewers as consultants for trend analysis and market forecasts. This is often the evolution of most technologies born out of the U.S. Department of Defense. Top Secret experiments and the resulting technological advancements can stay secretive for so long. This has recently been used in a NBC story of the Television drama "Medium" this last season. On July 9, 2008 I had recorded an AM radio live broadcast on WHAN Coast to Coast with a guest that was one of the leading Physicist turned Remote Viewer and expert that testified to this same notion.
Updated Sunday, September 6, 2009 3:26:09 PM
VANDALISM; THEFT; AND HARASSMENT REPORT September 6, 2009
Advanced Media Group AND Stan J. Caterbone 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA 17603 email@example.com www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com 717-669-2163 (No Voice Mail)
September 6, 2009 There are several new incidents since September 2, 2009 to report.
On Friday, September 4, 2009 I spent about an hour with a technician/salesman from Select Security, a company owned and operated by Lancaster Township resident Patrick Egan, for a proposal and estimate on a security and monitoring system for my home/office at 125 3:26:09 PM0 Fremont Street. We agreed on a price and payment schedule and he gave me an installation date of Wednesday, September 9, 2009. He left the meeting to meet with Patrick Egan and was supposed to email me an electronic version of the hardware; and payment schedule. He later emailed me and said ““Hey Stan, Select Security is unable to assist you with your security needs. Thanks, Matt Self, Sales and Marketing Coordinator, Select Security, 241 N. Plum Street, Lancaster, PA 17602, Direct: (717) 481-6307 * Fax: (717) 481-7574 ”
September 4, 2009 during First Friday in Downtown Lancaster I (1991 Dodge Dakota 4WD Pickup Truck) was rear ended with malice by two Spanish persons driving a 1991 Chevrolet Blazer, Burgundy SW. Damage to my rear bumper. I was smart enough to stay in the exact position and made certain the assailants did the same. I took crime scene photos that proved the car was not legally registered at the time of the incident and the tires were aligned toward my truck, proving that they came across from the inner lane on King Street as I was backing into a parking spot. Also, it is my testimony that the female was driving and first got out of her car yelling at me and accusing me of being drunk and a crack head. I had just come from Sheetz on Manheim Pike; Lancaster Bicycle Shop on Manheim Pike; Weis Markets; Home Depot; and the Office Max, all of Red Rose Commons, after leaving my home/office. I have time stamped receipts. I was at no other place during the entire day. The incident occurred at approximately 8:15pm with Lancaster City Police Officer Mendez, Badge No. 92. The assailants’ names are George Maldonado of 1202 Clay Road, #1, Lititz, Pennsylvania, 17543 and Kristin Wilson, 220 Kinseyville Road, Nottingham, PA 19362. They have Allstate Insurance, Policy No. 928473088. I have 10 crime scene photos. The Assign. No. is 004463. Two James Street Investment District Bike Patrol Persons also harassed me, both males that I did not recognized. As soon as the Lancaster City Police responded I made sure he called the Lancaster City Safety Coalition to see if a video was available.
My Zenith SM274481195 36” Television/Stereo was vandalized yesterday, September 5, 2009 and no longer works at all. The power no longer comes on.
After sealing my patio with a brown tarp, the corner closest to Dawn Sutton of 1248 Fremont Street was totally undone by vandals, yesterday or last night, September 5, 2009.
I was harassed by Dawn Sutton and chased off of my patio roof while painting yesterday, September 5, 2009 then she followed and stalked me at the CVS Store, Manor Shopping Center about an hour later.
Considering that about a month ago they vandalized and broke my Sharp RV-DV550U Digital VHS/DVD Recorder and my Panasonic RF-PV275 27.5” Flat Screen DVD/VHS Television Set, just about every piece of electronics has now been vandalized in my home, including 2 laptop computers, 1 desktop computer, and 2 ink jet printers.
September 4, 2009 On September 4, 2009 we applied for security through Select Security of Plum Street, Lancaster, Pennsylvania and are awaiting a response. Choice Security and Yarnell Security have already been excluded from any type of inquiry due to fraud and or harassment in the past regarding the installation and monitoring of a home security system at 220 Stone Hill Road, Conestoga, Pennsylvania. No one better cause a problem in our negotiations for a home security system for our home/office at 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, Pennsylvania.
This report does not cover all incidents, but was compiled mainly due to the surge in vandalism over the past week or so.
Since the end of June, 2009 we have been dictating memos on a micro cassette recorder and securing them offsite. This new techniques was administered mainly as the result of the Pain Assault initiated on July 8, 2009 and executed in part by the Lancaster General Hospital, the Lancaster Regional Medical Center, the Lancaster City Police, and Mastropietro and Associates Family Practice.
The memos are of daily incidents of vandalism; harassment; stalking; and torture by directed energy devices and weapons and or electromagnetic microwave technology. (See Executive Summary - Federal Whistleblower and Targeted Individual of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control dated July 28, 2009)
September 3, 2009
Update on Current and Recent Vandalism/Theft Reports:
September 2, 2009 – broke gear cable on bike in order to cause accident by having cable wrap around chain while riding. Vandalism happened in front of Fulton Bank, Manor Shopping Center, where bike was parked. Also bent front reflector.
September 1, 2009 – broke outside light under patio and left the metal in the socket so that you have to remove without being able to unscrew the actual light bulb.
Stole bird feed from backyard bird feeder, twice in last week and a half.
Drain hot tub of water on a continuous basis.
On August 27th or 28th soaked passenger floor of 1991 Dodge Pick-up Truck. This used to be done every time it rained, however, it stopped on or about June 15, 2009 when William “Lefty” Richard Plank was committed to Lancaster County Prison
Hacked new Compaq Presario Laptop.
On August 28, 2009 hacked the edit page of Advanced Media Group website, www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com .
Just about every home improvement done over the last several days has been sabotaged after completion, or they have done everything to prevent me from making purchases required for the projects.
September 1, 2009 Other Incidents And Surges Of Harassment; Vandalism; And Electromagnetic and Telepathic Torture of last few days (August 25, 2009 to August 29, 2009) :
Today, August 29, 2009 Six (6”) of Water drained from hot tub.
Today, August 29, 2009 Passenger Side Floor Flooded with Water.
Brand New Compaq Presario CQ60-421NR Does Not Operate Without Major Problems.
Office Max Sold Computer and Software on Misinformation regarding Microsoft Office, Which Had to be Returned.
Today, August 29, 2009 Went to the Manheim Township Police Station to Report Thefts by Deception and got Harassed by Officer Taking Report; He Tried To Provoke Me.
Lancaster Solid Waste Management Would Not Provide Correct Information for Recycling Yard Waste.
Constantly Harassed By Neighbors, Especially the “Bloods” and “Crypts” or CrackHeads.
Saturday, August 29, 2009 9:50:00 AM (4) Four Manheim Township Merchants Commit Theft By Deception on August 26th, August 27th, and August 28th of 2009.
August 26, 2009 - Lens Crafters, Park City Mall, Manheim Township, Pennsylvania refused to provide Eye Examination for Prescription Glasses and/or Prescription Glasses.
August 27, 2009 - Kohls Department Store, Park City Mall, Manheim Township, Pennsylvania switched a pair of Asics Sneakers Size 9 to Avia Size 11 at the checkout counter.
August 27, 2009 - Dr. Harry Breitman, Optometrist, Park City Mall, Manheim Township, Pennsylvania Examined Eyes for $49.00 and the Prescription was wrong.
August 28, 2009 - Eyemart Express Store No. 71, Park City Mall, Manheim Township, Pennsylvania, Charged $288.86 for (2) Pair of eyeglasses that were not right and could not be used, $288.86 was voided that day, however no credit was issued on bank statement as of yet.
August 28, 2009 - Cartridge World, of 1937-B Fruitville Pike, Manheim Township, Pennsylvania, charged $35.76 for (2) Lexmark Ink Cartridges that were empty. The black printed 3 pages before running out of ink and the color cartridge registered as "Low Ink" upon installation.
Friday, August 28, 2009 9:00:00 AM PRESS RELEASE Stan J. Caterbone Awarded Social Security Benefits for Mind Control Symptoms
Lancaster, PA - Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group are awarded benefits for claiming disability due to Mind Control and Telepathic Harassment from the Social Security Administration and the Health and Human Services Secretary on August 20, 2009. Stan J. Caterbone applied for benefits on April 8, 2009 claiming harassment; torture; covert surveillance; electromagnetic weapons; and intellectual property and privacy invasions.
In July of 2009 Stan J. Caterbone and the Advanced Media Group sent a detailed letter and documentation (55 page pdf file) regarding Mind Control Research and victim accounts for himself, his father (Samuel [Sam] P. Caterbone, Jr.) and brother (Samuel[Sammy] A. Caterbone) to Kathy Sebelius, Secretary of U.S. Health and Human Services in Washington, D.C.. Secretary Sebelius' office in turn sent the documents to the Office of Public Query of the Social Security Administration. The benefits were awarded twenty (20) days later.
Benefits have been awarded for the time period of April 8, 2009 to the present with monthly benefits to be received until the symptoms are eliminated or gainful employment/business income resumes. The following are excerpts from some of the application documents:
Social Security Administration:” Please describe your present work activities and any changes since your disability...."
Stan J. Caterbone/Advanced Media Group Respons: "Same work acitivities - Interference; harassment; theft; vandalism of files; computers hacked; libel; slander; industrial espionage; intellectual property stolen."
Lancaster City Police Prove Me Right Again - Refuse To Take Complaint of Vandalism - And Harass Me During The Process!
On Saturday morning I went to my truck to drive to a Community Breakfast (Free Meals) and my battery was dead. Nothing was left on. I called 911 and an Officer by the name of CARPENTER arrived all cocky and belligerent. He refused to take an Organized Stalking/Directed Energy Devices Brochure and ripped of 3 laminated postings on the PP&L telephone pole in front of my house (they were there for over a year, viewed by other Lancaster City Police Officers). He said that my complaint was "UNFOUNDED" and Officer Carpenter was only interested in provoking me so he could charge me with a disorderly conduct and try another 302 Psychiatric Evaluation Petition.
POOR OFFICER CARPENTER GOT A TASTE OF STAN J. CATERBONE, AGAIN. I need to remind the Lancaster City Police Department Albert Einstein's definition of insanity, doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result".
Tuesday, August 18, 2009 12:00:00 PM NEW CRIMINAL/CIVIL COMPLAINT FILED IN PERSON TO PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL AND UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE/FBI Today I filed complaints in person with the Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office in Harrisburg (Stamped and Recorded in Executive Office); the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) in Harrisburg (Discussed Complaint with Duty Agent); and hand delivered the Executive Summary and Victim's Account of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control with Supporting Documents (86 Pages)and my Lippiat and NSA Amicus ; Executive Summary U.S. Senator Arlen Specter’s Office in Harrisburg (met with Harrisburg staffer and discussed case); and with the Deputy Prothonotary of the Pennsylvania Superior Court (delivered to receptionist; Deputy Prothonotary in Court Proceeding) Deputy Prothonotary McCullough who I filed complaint against left the Superior Court in April of 2009).
The complaints included allegations of the following: · Obstruction of Justice · Fraud · Mail Fraud · Public Corruption · U.S. Sponsored Mind Control · U.S. Federal Torts Claim Act Violations · Abuse of Process · Identity Theft · Anti-Trust/Intellectual Property Violations
Sunday, August 16, 2009 12:00:00 PM
HIPPOCRATIC OATH FOR PHYSICIANS AND PSYCHIATRISTS I swear by Apollo Physician and Asclepius and Hygieia and Panacea and all the gods, and goddesses, making them my witnesses, that I will fulfill according to my ability and judgment this oath and this covenant:
To hold him who has taught me this art as equal to my parents and to live my life in partnership with him, and if he is in need of money to give him a share of mine, and to regard his offspring as equal to my brothers in male lineage and to teach them this art–if they desire to learn it–without fee and covenant; to give a share of precepts and oral instruction and all the other learning to my sons and to the sons of him who has instructed me and to pupils who have signed the covenant and have taken the oath according to medical law, but to no one else.
I will apply dietic measures for the benefit of the sick according to my ability and judgment; I will keep them from harm and injustice.
I will neither give a deadly drug to anybody if asked for it, nor will I make a suggestion to this effect. Similarly I will not give to a woman an abortive remedy. In purity and holiness I will guard my life and my art.
I will not use the knife, not even on sufferers from stone, but will withdraw in favor of such men as are engaged in this work.
Whatever houses I may visit, I will come for the benefit of the sick, remaining free of all intentional injustice, of all mischief and in particular of sexual relations with both female and male persons, be they free or slaves.
What I may see or hear in the course of treatment or even outside of the treatment in regard to the life of men, which on no account one must spread abroad, I will keep myself holding such things shameful to be spoken about.
If I fulfill this oath and do not violate it, may it be granted to me to enjoy life and art, being honored with fame among all men for all time to come; if I transgress it and swear falsely, may the opposite of all this be my lot.
· Friday, August 14, 10:44:25 AM NEW PAIN ASSAULT STARTED THIS WEEK AUGUST 10, 2009 - BACK ACHES!
Since the Pain Assault in my mouth is now over, they started going back to the old Directed Energy Device Weapons with Back, Neck, and Headaches.
August 11, 2009 1:15:38PM
I had someone at my window last night, sounded like they were trying to open screen window. Called 911 and made complaints about 2 other incidents for yesterday, August 10, 2009 ( dead battery at UPS Store, Stone Mill Plaza and 8 inches of water taken out of hottub).
Lancaster County Wide and Lancaster City Police forget that I have a Police Band Radio. I taped Lancaster County Wide Communications lie to the Lancaster Police and said that I hung up, then the Lancaster City Police said "that is the response I thought, or something like that.
Then, a sometime later, Lancaster City Police scare the hell out of me shining a flashlight in my back kitchen door and window.
Why didn't the Lancaster City Police ring the door bell and come to the front door?????
Thankfully for my microcassette tape recorder, gotcha again!
August 7, 2009 10:21:59 Lancaster General Hospital (LGH)Tried to Get a Court Order under the 302 Commitment to have Advanced Media Group's website taken down:
Dr. Daniel McIntyre stated on the medical file the following as part of his notes: "... Patient has a long history of delusional thoughts secondary to his Bipolar disorder. He apparently has a website that provides him an avenue to express his grandiose thoughts and delusions. This patient is clearly in need of psychiatric help. He also needs medical attention to the dental abscess he currently is suffering with. I do not feel the patient is safe for outpatient follow up. I have arranged for Conestoga Oral surgery to admit the patient with a 302 petition in place. Psychiatry to see patient in consultation." Transcribed on Mon Jul 20, 2009 12:57 AM
Monday, August 3, 2009 12:49:05 PM
Dr. Denise Cope of Family Practice Associates of Lancaster on Abbeville Road, Lancaster, better not refuse me as a new patient as my primary care physician. Today, August 3, 2009, I submitted my forms to transfer to that practice and the receptionist tried to tell me that she needs to review my medical file from Mastropietro Associates first. This is not what I was told on July 29, 2009 when I first picked up the paperwork to switch primary care physicians.
Today, August 3, 2009 in my appointment with Dr. Henrichsen of Conestoga Oral Surgeons, he said it will be a month or more until my mouth opens wider. I am still restricted to an opening of only 1/2 inch.
The following was broken and vandalized in the past week (July 25, 2009 to August 3, 2009): one gas powered week whacker; one 27" Panasonic TV (VCR will no longer work); one Sharp DVD VCR Recorder (VCR will no longer work); my saddle bag for my briefcase.
I also in recent weeks added the following to CATERBONE v. Duke Street Business Center CI-08-13373 President Obama; Attorney General Eric Holder; and Chief of Lancaster City Police Keith Sadler; among others. I will be claiming racial and ethnic discrimination in that complaint.
The Project Hope Tommy Caterbone Memorial Golf Tournament that was held at Crossgates Golf Course yesterday, Saturday, August 1, 2009 ended in disaster. I attended two times, once in the afternoon and once in the evening. Did not see anyone I recognized on the Golf Course, and there was no dinner at 6:00 pm, as in the past 13 years. Jimmy Karpathios; his wife; Tina Albright; Lizzy Pflumm; Pami Pflumm; Dave Pflumm; Bill Pflumm; Tina Dougherty; Dakota Royer; Tina Royer; James Doran; all were there around the pavilion, lying to me about the golf tournament.
Lizzy Pflumm is now a confirmed Professional Stalker and Harasser. What the hell, did the Pflumm's take over Project Hope. I did see a prize table with tee shirts and golf shirts, which of course I was able to walk away with, with permission from someone.
First a worker from Crossgates told me in the afternoon that dinner was at 5:30, then in the evening, 2 workers said it was served at 3:00 pm.
You people just don't quite.
Staples of Golden Triangle Shopping Center refused on 2 occasions to print 2 brochures from Freedom From Covert Harassment and Surveillance Organization (www.freedomfchs.com). One on Organized Stalking and Harassment and One on Directed Energy Devices. On Wednesday July 29, 2009 it was Brett ... and on Friday July 31, 2009 it was a white female. They are already a named party as a defendant on CI-08-13373 in the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas.
Wednesday afternoon, July 28, 2009, Steve Midciff, CEO of Lancaster Regional Medical Center agreed to a meeting to discuss their conduct. The meeting was scheduled for Thursday, July 29, 2009 at 10:00am.
Steve Midciff, the CEO of Lancaster Regional Medical Center and Dr. Anthony Mastropietro, my former Primary Care Physician, ambushed me and assaulted me in another attempt to 302 me. I had to leave after about one minute in his office. Could not believe it. Just like Lori Austin of Millersville University and the former head of LETA had done to me the past few months.
Then today, July 30, 2009 I had a medical appointment with Dr. Rodriquez of Mastropietro Associates for a 2nd opinion of my jaw, which still only opens 1/2" after emergency surgery. Again, Dr. Mastropietro (via telephone) and his office manager assaulted me on the telephone, he said "do you remember meeting with me yesterday?". The would not let me meet with Dr. Rodriquez. Did they harm me three times, one by making me visit the Emergency Room 4 times before they would treat me; then did they do something wrong at surgery?; and now they are trying to cover up all the mistakes with yet another 302 petition. These people need some serious help.
I immediately went to a Family Practice on Abbeville Road and started the process of switching my primary care physician.
Saturday, July 25, 2009 I am recuperating from surgery, they did put me under general anesthesia. I still am not able to open my jaw very wide, and must crumble my food.
On Thursday evening, July 23, 2009 another tooth began hurting me, and they again began hitting me with Directed Energy Devices with Harassment.
For the record, on Sunday evening at no time did the Lancaster City Police or Lancaster General Hospital ever present me with a 302 Warrant at my home or in the Lancaster General Hospital.
Sunday evening, July 19, 2009; LANCASTER CITY POLICE HANDCUFF ME IN MY HOME, TAKE ME AND ONLY SHIRT, SHOES, PANTS, WALLET TO LGH AT 9:20PM.
Some of incident I have recorded of Lancaster City Police in my home.
Admitted to Behavioral Medicine in Emergency Room at Lancaster General Hospital about 9:45pm Sunday Evening, July 19, 2009.
Three hours later taken to Intermediate Intensive Care Unit Room Number 6003.
Monday, July 20, 2009 emergency surgery done on mouth, including infection that reached into my blood stream and system.
Operation a success, thanks to Dr. Henrichsen, MD of Conestoga Oral Surgeons and the LGH Intensive Care Unit/Operating Room Team. Interviewed by Two (2) LGH Psychiatrists who refused to sign into 302 Petition Efforts by LANCASTER CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT.
DISCHARGED FROM LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL ON JULY 22, 2009.
See Symptoms of the United Nations Petition in the FFCHS, Freedom From Covert Harassment and Surveillance Document.
Harassment by Lancaster General Hospital Doctors and Nurses. Dr. Vito DiCarmillo and Company.
Possibly Given Wrong Medication.
Left with Little Mobility in Jaw. Cannot Eat Most Foods.
Cavity; Electromagnetic Weapons; Poison; or a combination of the three!
Dr. Black, the Dentist from Willow Street, refused me as a patient yesterday, July 15, 2009. Was a patient since 1994.
Since January I have been refused treatment by a dentist from Southeast Clinic, Lancaster City, New Holland Dental and Dr. West, and now Dr. Black and Associates of Willow Street.
Pharmacist (Mr. Jacobs) at CVS, Manor Shopping Center advised me to see an Endocrinologist, yesterday, while harassing me.
Pharmacist at Weis Markets, Amy Brent, was harassing, yesterday, July 15, 2009.
My mobility in my jaw went from 1" to 1/2", as of today, July 16, 2009.
Pain is not subsiding, although, with the aid of Momentum Back Relievers, I have been able to reduce swelling in face.
I must go back to another Emergency Room again today, the 8th day of this PAIN ASSAULT.
I CAN NO LONG EAT SOLID FOODS!! WHEN WILL I BE ABLE TO EAT AGAIN!!!!
WILL ANYONE PLEASE HELP ME?
Do Not Have Access to Computers/Internet or Time To Provide More Detail.
Saturday, July 4, 2009 11:23:00 AM
Who Are My Captors? (Go to "New Document Library" of this Website and Document No. 4. "U.S. Attorney Complaint..." For The Entire Documents Referenced Below)
Cheney's 'Spoon-Benders Pushing Nucluear Armageddon http://www.larouchepub.com/other/2005/3233spoonbeners.htm by Jeffrey Steinberg
"The "Mind War" paper was provoked by an article by Lt. Col. John Alexander, which appeared in the December 1980 edition of Military Review, advocating the introduction of ESP (extra-sensory perception), "telepathic behavior modification", Para-psychology, psycho kinesis ("mind over matter"), remote viewing, out of body experiences, and other New Age and occult practices into U.S. Military intelligence. Alexander's paper wat titled "The New Mental Battlefield: Beam Me Up, Spock".
"In preparation for this article, EIR has interviewed a number of senior retired military and intelligence officers, who have identified, form their own personal experiences, a number of other leading military officers, who have promoted these efforts and funneled massive amounts of Pentagon money into "black programs" (black budget), testing the military applications of a whole range of bizarre "non-lethal" techniques and technologies. some of the top-secret programs funded by taxpayer dollars over the past 25 years betray a significant degree of outright "spoon-bending" lunacy. Others lead directly to the doorsteps of Guantanamo Bay and Abu Ghraib military detention centers, where prisoners have been turned into human guinea pigs for experimental torture techniques, drawn from the same New Age bag of tricks."
"Gen. Albert Stubblebine III was the head of U.S. Army Intelligence, INSCOM (Intelligence and Security Command), from 1981 to 1984, during which time he launched a series of secret projects at Fort Meade, Md. involving remote viewing and other occult practices. General Stubblebine was perhaps, the U.S. Army's most senior and loudest advocate of the full gamut of the New Age warfare."
"Channon's First Earth Battalion slide show was brought to General Stubblebine, the head of INSCOM, by Colonel Alexander, the author of the Military Review article on "the New Mental Battlefield", and, by 1981, Stubblebine established a secret "psychic spies unit" at Fort Meade, to test out such dubious techniques as remote viewing."
War Crimes by marsboy683 http://marsboy683.wordpress.com/2009/04/04/war-crimes-4pgs/
"In 1993 the National Institute of Justice, (part of the Department of Justice DOJ) began the "NIJ initiative on Less-Than-Lethal Weapons", recommending that state and local police department in American utilize psychotropic, and electromagnetic weapons against American citizens involved in "domestic disturbances". the report said, "Short term research will be completed to adopt military technology to use by domestic law enforcement... including laser, microwave, and electromagnetic weapons". The Washington Post reported, "The Pentagon and the DOJ have agreed to share state-of-the-art military weapons with civilian law enforcement agencies, including exotic "non-lethal weapons".
Thursday, July 2, 2009 8:45:29 PM To My Captors and Mind Control Handlers:
1.The constitution guarantees the right of the people to be secure in their person. The Declaration of Independence asserts as self-evident that all men have certain inalienable rights and that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. 2. As Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis wrote in 1928, "the framers of the Constitution sought "to protect Americans in their beliefs, their thoughts, their emotions, and their sensations." It is for this reason they established, as against the government, the right to be let alone as "the most comprehensive of rights and the right most valued by men". 3. The first principle of the Nurembert Code state that with respect to human research, the valuntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. The Nuremberg Code further asserts that such consent must be competent, informed, and comprehensive. 4. There are current regulations implementing the obligations of the United States to adhere to Article 3 fo the United Nations Convention Against Torture and other Formes of Cruel, Inhumane or Degrading Treatment including all terms that are subject to any reservations, understandings, declarations, and provisions contained in the United States Senate resolution of ratification of the Convention.
Saturday, June 20, 2009 12:40:07 PM - WE APOLOGIZE; HOWEVER WE HAVE LOST OUR ACCESS TO THE INTERNET AND WILL NOT BE UPDATING OUR WEBSITE UNTIL FURTHER NOTICE.
Notice and Disclaimer:
Stan J. Caterbone and the Advanced Media Group have been slandered, defamed, and publicly discredited since 1987 due to going public (Whistle Blower) with allegations of misconduct and fraud within International Signal & Control, Plc. of Lancaster, Pa. (ISC pleaded guilty to selling arms to Iraq via South Africa and a $1 Billion Fraud in 1992). Unfortunately we are forced to defend our reputation and the truth without the aid of law enforcement and the media, which would normally prosecute and expose public corruption. We utilize our communications to thwart further libelous and malicious attacks on our person, our property, and our business. We continue our fight for justice through the Courts, and some communications are a means of protecting our rights to continue our pursuit of justice. Advanced Media Group is also a member of the media.
PRESS RELEASE Wednesday, May 20, 2009 6:22:37 PM
Lancaster, Pennsylvania, Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Proposed ORGANIZED STALKING AND DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS HARASSMENT BILL to Pennsylvania House of Representative Mike Sturla (Lancaster, Pennsylvania) and City of Lancaster Mayor Richard Gray.
The draft legislation is the work of Missouri House of Representative Jim Guest, who has been working on helping victims of these horrendous crimes for years. The bill will provide protections to individuals who are being harassed, stalked, harmed by surveillance, and assaulted; as well as protections to keep individuals from becoming human research subjects, tortured, and killed by electronic frequency devices, directed energy devices, implants, and directed energy weapons.
Stan J. Caterbone has been a victim of organized stalking since 1987 and a victim of electronic and direct energy weapons since 2005. Stan J. Caterbone will help introduce measures that also pertain to remote viewing; mental telepathy and synthetic telepathy in more detail. Personal accounts of his pain and torture are also filed in various United States federal and state courts.
Click Here to Download Draft of Organized Stalking and Directed Energy Devices and Weapons Bill and list of Pennsylvania Representatives.
We are urging you to contact your local representatives and support our efforts to pass this legislation. Below you will find the listings of Pennslvania Stae Representatives. For More Information Please Contact Us At: firstname.lastname@example.org The following is a draft of the legislation: Organized Stalking and Directed Energy Devices and Weapons Bill
Section 1. Short Title
This bill may be cited as the “Organized Stalking and Directed Energy Devices and Weapons Bill" A) Findings
1) The constitution guarantees the right of the people to be secure in their person. The Declaration of Independence asserts as self-evident that all men have certain inalienable rights and that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. 2) As Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis wrote in 1928, “the framers of the Constitution sought "to protect Americans in their beliefs, their thoughts, their emotions, and their sensations." It is for this reason that they established, as against the government, the right to be let alone as "the most comprehensive of rights and the right most valued by civilized men.“ 3) The first principle of the Nuremberg Code states that with respect to human research, the voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. The Nuremberg Code further asserts that such consent must be competent, informed, and comprehending. 4) There are current regulations implementing the obligations of the United States to adhere to Article 3 of the United Nations Convention Against Torture and other Forms of Cruel, Inhumane or Degrading Treatment including all terms that are Subject to any reservations, understandings, declarations, and provisions contained in the United
States Senate resolution of ratification of the Convention.
To establish regulations and penalties for those who use any type of electronic frequency devices, directed energy devices, implants, surveillance technology, and directed energy weapon to purposefully cause any of the following: stalking, harassing, mental or physical harm, injury, harmful surveillance, torture, diseases, and death to any United States citizen.
Section 3. Organized Stalking
If two or more persons willfully, maliciously, and repeatedly follow or willfully and maliciously harass another person and who make a credible threat with the intent to place that person in reasonable fear for his or her safety, or the safety of his or her immediate family, they are guilty of the crime of organized stalking, punishable by imprisonment in a county jail for not more than one year, or by not more than one thousand dollars ($ 1,000), or by both that fine and imprisonment, or by imprisonment in a federal prison.
If two or more persons violate subdivision (a) when there is a temporary restraining order, injunction, or any other court order in effect prohibiting the behavior described in subdivision (a) against the same party, they shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for two, three, or four years.
For the purposes of this section, "harass" means engages in a knowing and willful course of conduct directed at a specific person that seriously alarms, annoys, torments, or terrorizes the person, or damages his personal property or possessions and that serves no legitimate purpose. * * *
For the purposes of this section, "course of conduct" means two or more acts occurring over a period of time, however short, evidencing a continuity of purpose. Constitutionally protected activity is not included within the meaning of "course of conduct."
For the purposes of this section, "credible threat" means a verbal or written threat, including that performed through the use of an electronic communication device, or a threat implied by a pattern of conduct or a combination of verbal, written, or electronically communicated statements and conduct, made with the intent to place the person that is the target of the threat in reasonable fear for his or her safety or the safety of his or her family, or personal property or possessions and made with the apparent ability to carry out the threat so as to cause the person who is the target of the threat to reasonably fear for his or her safety or the safety of his or her family or personal property or possessions. It is not necessary to prove that the defendant had the intent to actually carry out the threat. The present incarceration of a person making the threat shall not be a bar to prosecution under this section. Constitutionally protected activity is not included within the meaning of "credible threat."
For purposes of this section, the term "electronic communication device" includes, but is not limited to, telephones, cellular phones, computers, video recorders, fax machines, pagers or synthetic telepathy devices.
The sentencing court also shall consider issuing an order restraining the defendant from any contact with the victim, that may be valid for up to 10 years, as determined by the court. It is the intent of the Legislature that the length of any restraining order be based upon the seriousness of the facts before the court, the probability of future violations, and the safety of the victim and his or her immediate family.
For purposes of this section, "immediate family" means any spouse, parent, child, any person related by consanguinity or affinity within the second degree, or any other person who regularly resides in the household, or who, within the prior six months, regularly resided in the household.
Section 4. Punishment for threats
Any person or persons who willfully threatens to commit a crime which will result in death or great bodily injury to another person, with the specific intent that the statement, made verbally, in writing, or by means of an electronic communication device, is to be taken as a threat, even if there is no intent of actually carrying it out, which, on its face and under the circumstances in which it is made, is so unequivocal, unconditional, immediate, and specific as to convey to the person threatened, a gravity of purpose and an immediate prospect of execution of the threat, and thereby causes that person reasonably to be in sustained fear for his or her own safety or for his or her immediate family's safety, shall be punished by imprisonment in a federal prison not to exceed one year..
For the purposes of this section, "immediate family" means any spouse, whether by marriage or not, parent, child, any person related by consanguinity or affinity within the second degree, or any other person who regularly resides in the household, or who, within the prior six months, regularly resided in the household.
"Electronic communication device" includes, but is not limited to, telephones, cellular telephones, computers, video recorders, fax machines, pagers or synthetic telepathy devices.
Obscene, threatening or annoying communication
(a) Every person or persons who, with intent to annoy, telephones or makes constant contact by means of an electronic communication device with another and addresses to or about the other person any obscene language or addresses to the other person any threat to inflict injury to the person or any member of his or her family, or any property or personal possessions is guilty of a misdemeanor. Nothing in this subdivision shall apply to telephone calls or electronic contacts made in good faith.
(b) Every person or persons who makes repeated telephone calls or makes repeated contact by means of an electronic communication device with intent to annoy another person at his or her residence, is, whether or not conversation ensues from making the telephone call or electronic contact, is guilty of a misdemeanor. Nothing in this subdivision shall apply to telephone calls or electronic contacts made in good faith.
(c) Every person or persons who makes repeated telephone calls or makes repeated contact by means of an electronic communication device with the intent to annoy another person at his or her place of work is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of not more than one thousand dollars ($ 1,000), or by imprisonment in a federal prison for not more than one year, or by both that fine and imprisonment. Nothing in this subdivision shall apply to telephone calls or electronic contacts made in good faith. This subdivision applies only if one or both of the following circumstances exist:
(1) There is a temporary restraining order, an injunction, or any other court order, or any combination of these court orders, in effect prohibiting the behavior described in this section.
(2) The person or persons makes repeated telephone calls or makes repeated contact by means of an electronic communication device with the intent to annoy another person at his or her place of work, totaling more than 10 times in a 24-hour period, whether or not conversation ensues from making the telephone call or electronic contact, and the repeated telephone calls or electronic contacts are made to the workplace of an adult or fully emancipated minor who is a spouse, former spouse, cohabitant, former cohabitant, or person with whom the person has a child or has had a dating or engagement relationship or is having a dating or engagement relationship.
(d) Any offense committed by use of a telephone may be deemed to have been committed where the telephone call or calls were made or received. Any offense committed by use of an electronic communication device or medium, including the Internet, may be deemed to have been committed when the electronic communication or communications were originally sent or first viewed by the recipient.
(e) Subdivision (a), (b), or (c) is violated when the person acting with intent to annoy makes a telephone call requesting a return call and performs the acts prohibited under subdivision (a), (b), or (c) upon receiving the return call.
(f) If probation is granted, or the execution or imposition of sentence is suspended, for any person or persons convicted under this section, the court may order as a condition of probation that the person participate in counseling.
(g) For purposes of this section, the term "electronic communication device" includes, but is not limited to, telephones, cellular phones, computers, video recorders, fax machines, pagers or synthetic telepathy devices.
Section 5. Assault and battery with an electronic or directed energy weapon
Any person or persons who in the course of organized stalking and harassment, commits an assault upon the person of another with an unauthorized directed energy weapon shall be punished by imprisonment in a federal prison for two, three, or four years or by a fine not exceeding ten thousand dollars ($10,000).
For the purposes of this section the term directed energy weapon is defined as any device that directs a source of energy (including molecular or atomic energy, subatomic particle beams, electromagnetic radiation, plasma, or extremely low frequency (ELF) or ultra low frequency (ULF) energy radiation) against a person or any other unacknowledged or as yet undeveloped means of inflicting death or injury; or damaging or destroying, a person (or the biological life, bodily health, mental health, or physical and economic well-being of a person via land-based, sea-based, or space-based systems using radiation, electromagnetic, psychotronic, sonic, laser, or other energies directed at individual persons or targeted populations for the purpose of information war, mood management, or mind control of such persons or populations; or by expelling chemical or biological agents in the vicinity of a person.
Thursday, February 12, 2009 3:34:39 PM My father, Samuel Caterbone (U.S. Navy; deceased 2001), Jr., by brother Samuel A. Caterbone (U.S. Air Force; deceased 1984) and myself, Stanley J. Caterbone (Federal Whistleblower 1987 on ISC ; DOD Contractor & ISC Shareholder 1983 to 1987) are all victims of MK-Ultra (Mind Control) or one of its 149 subprograms. My father was telepathic (Remote Viewing & Shock Therapy) and ; my brother was administered LSD while in the Air Force in the 1960's; and of course I am telepathic (Remote Viewing) and been subjected to torture.
Wednesday, February 11, 2009 11:11:24 AM "S.A.I.C. involvement in 1993 American Para psychological Association meeting arrangements, via their 'Cognitive Sciences Laboratory'. Science Applications International Corporation is a big time defense contractor, has held the largest number of research contracts of any defense contractor. Bobby Ray Inman (ISC Board of Directors) is on its board of directors, among others." by John Porter, CIA Program on Mind Control copyright 1996
***"In 1994, after Bobby Ray Inman requested to be withdrawn from consideration as Bill Clinton's first Defense Secretary, his critics speculated that the decision was motivated by a desire to conceal his links to ISC. Inman was a member of the so-called "shadow board" of the company which was allegedly either negligent or approved the exports." by Wikipedia on International Signal and Control, (ISC).
February 9, 2009 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney General Eastern District of Philadelphia 615 Chestnut Street Suite 1250 Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19106-4476
Re: Public Corruption; Violations of Civil Rights; RICO; Civil and Criminal Conspiracy; Extortion; Etc.,
Defendants: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania; President Judge William Johnstone, Jr.,; Lancaster City Police Department; Pennsylvania State Police; Lancaster County District Attorney Office; Lancaster County Probation Office
Dear United States Attorney:
Enclosed is a complaint form and complaint for the above-mentioned violations. I am the son of Samuel Caterbone Jr., and have already filed a complaint regarding persons and officials of the County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania, which involved Fulton Bank that you received via certified mail on or about December 9, 2008. I am also claiming a Federal False Claims Act Violation regarding International Signal and Control, from 1987 that you may find referenced in the District Court for Eastern Pennsylvania. I have recently withdrawn all of my federal suits due to a long and protracted battle with obstruction of justice and interference with my litigation. I have recently won a decision in the Third Circuit Court of Appeals for case no. 07-4474, and withdrew the cases upon being returned to the District Court for further litigation. You may research the cases in the Eastern District Court and the Third Circuit for a background and history. I have been a pro se litigant since 2005.
On February 4, 2009 I came upon an order that was imposed against my father on August 29, 1973 by President Judge William Johnstone, Jr. of the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas(Cases No. 301 306-1973 and 1258-1972); that causes great dismay and disbelief. At the same time this ORDER verifies my own belief that dates back to 1987: the history of corruption and fraud concerning my own trials and tribulations with the County of Lancaster regarding my civil and criminal cases for the last 22 years were modeled after my father’s same perpetrators and corruption that plagued his life.
The ORDER reads: “On this date, the Honorable William G. Johnstone, Jr., President Judge directs that Samuel Caterbone, Jr., be released from probation and that he leave the area around Lancaster County (Penna.) as of August 29, 1973.”
Please remember, my father and mother, Yolanda Roda Caterbone had six children; and all this time we all believed that my father had ran out on us all. That was the story. Enclosed you will find my father’s criminal case, with the exception of the trial transcript, which I had requested on Friday from the Lancaster County Court Reporter’s Office.
There are several criminal allegations that I am making. First, the only charge my father was guilty of was forging his own companies check, Samuel Caterbone Cleaners (ironically only one in evidence - for divorce proceedings to an attorney). Secondly, I don’t believe there is any law that can support this order, especially considering he at the time was the father of six children and not legally divorced or separated. Thirdly, in the documents you will find a letter from the law firms of May, Grove, Stork, & Blakinger that is dissolution of my father’s company Samuel Caterbone Cleaners, Inc., dated September 30, 1974.
You will notice that current President Judge Louis J. Farina of the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas is a member. It is quite suspicious that during our 48th year, we both were illegally incarcerated and falsely imprisoned in the Lancaster County Prison during the months of October; November; and December. My father did at least 5 months, while I only had to do 2. I am also alleging public corruption by President Judge Farina in my own cases. The last and most notable is the Superior Court Appeal No. 113 MDA 2008; whereby President Judge Farina refused several motions to dismiss court appointed counsel William Campbell prior to the November 19, 2008 ORDER to dismiss my appeal due to Court Appointed Attorney William Campbell for failing to file a brief.
Jack Stork’s wife was Mayor of the City of Lancaster during the 1990’s. She was in a position to cover-up my accusations, which she did back then. I have a letter to her dating back to 1991-1992.
If you follow the history of Samuel Caterbone Cleaners., Inc., you will find that during the last year of operation the plant went through a tumultuous time of machinery breakdown, similar to my own experience the last few years. Furthermore, the business and property that my father had built and owned was sold for far less than it was worth at that time. I have the deeds and related documents to prove this out.
Now, if you follow my case history, you will find the same pattern of crimes, with the absolute same outcome, loss of reputation, loss of income; loss of property; loss of business interests; loss of social and personal friendships and relationships; and most importantly a fabricated mental illness history.
Unfortunately, there is but another complication, I am also alleging that my father, Samuel Caterbone Jr., my brother Samuel Caterbone, and myself Stanley J. Caterbone are all victims of the program MK-Ultra and or one of its subprograms. I have conclusive evidence to support my allegation; however do not want to entangle this subject at this time.
I wish you to only entertain the above referenced allegations at this time. I will await your further instructions on how to proceed.
Thank you for you time and considerations. I look forward to working with you, as there is more to come.
Respectfully, Stan J. Caterbone
PRESS RELEASE Advanced Media Group February 4, 2009 IS IT LEGAL TO THROW SOMEONE OUT OF THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER?
Lancaster, PA On August 29, 1973 Samuel Caterbone, Jr. (Father of Stan J. Caterbone) was ORDERED by Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Judge William G. Johnstone to "leave the area around Lancaster County Pennsylvania as of August 29, 1973 in Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Caterbone, Samuel (Docket No. 301 and 306 of 1973). A copy of the ORDER was found today, February 4, 2009 in the Clerk of Courts at the Lancaster County Courthouse. It was also found the Samuel Caterbone, Jr. was imprisoned from August of 1972 to February of 1973 for the charges that were brought about by the Lancaster City Police Department.
The ORDER of August 29, 1973 reads: "On this date, the Honorable William G. Johnstone, Jr., President Judge directs that Samuel Caterbone, Jr., be released from probation and that he leave the area around Lancaster County (Penna.) as of August 29, 1973"
Samuel Caterbone, Jr. was found guilty by jury of signing two checks from his business, Samuel Caterbone Cleaners, Inc., without the consent of his wife, Yolanda M. Roda Caterbone. One check was made out for $200.00 to attorney James Coho for divorce proceedings and the other check for $78.18 to Joe the Motorist Friend at the Manor Shopping Center for a hunting rifle. He was sentenced to one year probation and ordered to pay court costs (No fine: No Restitution).
Samuel Caterbone, Jr. was found not guilty of stealing $2,200 from his nephew, Joseph Ricupero III, former owner/developer of Strawberry Hill Restuarant, in the City of Lancaster. Samuel Caterbone, Jr., appeared pro se and represented himself at trial. Samuel Caterbone, Jr. testified in the arraignment that it was his money from the beginning before President Judge Hensel Brown.
Click Here to see video of meeting with U.S. Senator Arlen Specter on October 8, 2008 - Forward to end of interview. For this article click here http://www.raven1.net/mcsecsta.htm
From NameBase NewsLine, No. 12, January-March 1996: Mind Control and the Secret State
Last September the CIA confirmed the existence of a 20-year, $20 million research program in "remote viewing," a sub variety of extrasensory perception. On October 29, a Jack Anderson column added more details, and Ted Koppel of ABC's Nightline weighed in with a program on November 28, by which time many newspapers and wire services had picked up the story. By December, a number of pundits began lamenting this additional evidence of the CIA's protean power to waste taxpayers' money.
Curiously, "remote viewing" was an old story, first reported by Anderson himself on 23 April 1984. Other Anderson columns of U.S. and Soviet interest in psychic research date back to 1981. Anderson's October 29 update reported that this project, which for a time was contracted out to the Stanford Research Institute (SRI), had been scaled back and put under Pentagon sponsorship, but nevertheless continued. Although the results of these experiments were reportedly mixed, the project retains its defenders in Congress: Sen. Claiborne Pell (D-RI) and Rep. Charlie Rose (D-NC). By 1995, Anderson didn't have an opinion on the merits of this research, but his 1984 column was supportive. On Nightline, former CIA director Robert Gates implied that pressure from members of Congress drove the CIA's original involvement. Another of Ted Koppel's CIA guests, identified only as "Norm," was a technical advisor for CIA deputy director John McMahon and, until 1984, a coordinator for the SRI tests. "Norm" did mention the "eight-martini" results from some experiments; this was an in-house term for remote-viewing results so uncannily successful that observers needed eight martinis to recover. Still, the general impression from Koppel's show was dismissive. Only about "fifteen percent" of the experiments, panelists repeated, produced accurate results. Gates argued that such research, if undertaken at all, belongs in the academy.
Not for the first time, however, there's more to this story than Ted Koppel acknowledges.
Ingo Swann, who was involved in the SRI project from 1972-1988, is upset with the media's droll treatment of this revived story. Swann points out that the original motivation behind the "remote viewing" project was the fear that the Soviets were investing significant resources in applied psychic research, and might be making advances. At the time, at least, such a rationale would have been considered a plausible one to justify such a small expenditure of intelligence money. Nevertheless, almost all mention of this element of the story, which had figured prominently in the first wave of stories on "remote viewing," was dropped in 1995.
Furthermore, Swann claims, the "fifteen percent" figure, established early in the SRI project, represented the baseline accuracy for non-gifted and untrained persons. U.S. intelligence wanted sixty-five percent accuracy, and in the later stages of the project, Swann claims, "this accuracy level was achieved and often consistently exceeded." According to Swann, the key players in the project, and the documentation supporting the real story, remain under the strictest security constraints.
However this may be, Anderson's October 29 story reminds us that ESP is very much alive as an object of intelligence-community interest. In addition to "remote viewing" (seeing people, places, and events at a distance in space and time), another area of interest is the supposed power of "micro psycho- kinesis" or "Micro-PK" -- the ability to affect small objects, such as electrical systems, by using the mind. Micro-PK is one step away from outright telekinesis, and its supposed power has obvious attractions for the CIA. Imagine being able to erase a computer tape from a block away, or interfere with the avionics of a jet fighter, or detonate a warhead. Based on the evidence that's on the public record, the dream of harnessing such power, or even of establishing its existence, may be somewhat optimistic.
But this fact hasn't stopped a strange band of specialists, many of whom have government connections, from staking out careers at the intersection of, so to speak, ESP, the Pentagon, and the CIA: where people interested in parapsychology work with those interested in weapons research and mind control. These would-be psi-spooks turn up occasionally on talk shows and at conferences on "non-lethal defense." Their ranks include companies like PSI- TECH in Albuquerque, founded by Maj. Edward A. Dames, and figures such as Col. John B. Alexander of the Los Alamos National Laboratory, who was featured in the February 1995 issue of Wired magazine. Dames and Alexander and a dozen more blend in with spookier types who shun publicity but who show up at UFO and New Age gatherings. One is ex-Naval Intelligence officer C.B. Scott Jones, a former aide to Sen. Claiborne Pell.
Once again, it's likely that Ted Koppel doesn't have the whole story. It's also likely that he wouldn't be cleared to report it if he did. Still, the piddling pool of dollars so far devoted to this research strongly implies that, if the figure is accurate, intelligence-funded parapsychological research has been a bust.
The uncounted millions the CIA has spent on mind control suggest just the opposite. As with "remote viewing," the attraction of a successful mind control program to the CIA is obvious, and has long been explicitly acknow- ledged as such. The "Manchurian Candidate" scenario -- in which a programmed zombie-assassin responds to a post-hypnotic trigger, performs the act, and does not remember it later -- is one ideal type of successful mind control. A reliable truth serum, long the object of a CIA quest, would be another. Both of these are operational uses of mind control, its so-called "second front."
This term comes from former CIA director Allen Dulles. In 1953, Dulles, speaking before a national meeting of Princeton alumni, distinguished two fronts in the then-current "battle for men's minds": a "first front" of mass indoctrination through censorship and propaganda, and a "second front" of individual "brainwashing" and "brain changing." Before an audience of fellow Ivy Leaguers, Dulles skipped the usual pieties about democracy. The same year, Dulles approved the CIA's notorious MKULTRA project, and exempted it from normal CIA financial controls.
The distinction between Dulles's "two fronts" eventually becomes diffi-cult to sustain, like the distinction between, say, sociology and psychology. Still, this distinction can be useful in roughing out a spectrum of known mind- control techniques.
For example, one powerful tool for inducing ideological and behavioral change is social pressure in a controlled environment. The "brainwashing" employed during the Korean War did not involve the use drugs or hypnosis. The Chinese merely used the same techniques that they employed on the population at large, but with more intensity, greater control, and additional rewards and punishments such as food and sleep deprivation. Yet this frighteningly simple program was enough to crank up the brainwashing scare in the U.S. Some researchers now suspect that this hysterical episode had its origins in CIA- generated propaganda, designed to give the CIA the political space needed to research more sophisticated mind-control techniques.
Many undergraduates learn about the experiments conducted by Solomon Asch in the 1950s, which demonstrated that expressed opinions can be easily manipulated by social pressure, even in obvious cases, such as whether Line A is longer than Line B on a particular card. And Stanley Milgram showed that many unwitting research subjects would administer a series of escalating electric shocks to another, even to the point of an apparent heart attack, simply because a white-coated lab assistant asked them to continue. Milgram's research suggests that a "Manchurian Candidate" already exists in many of us, and that all that's required to bring him out may be a bit of propaganda. The historical evidence for blind human obedience that could be cited here is very familiar, and very depressing.
Still, there's evidence that Pentagon planners are uneasy about potential unruliness among the mass populations Dulles identified as mind control's "first front." Princeton alumni may perhaps follow and accept arguments that U.S. interests are at stake in Bosnia, but their sons are unlikely to be on the scene defending those supposed interests. The urban or Appalachian infantryman, and the family he comes from, may have other ideas.
Elite unease on this point may lie behind Pentagon enthusiasm for the new wrinkle in military force that goes by the name "non-lethal" or "less-than- lethal." Its very claim to embody a "humanitarian" form of warfare is a weapon in Dulles's "battle for men's minds."
Non-lethal technology becomes important in a discussion of mind control, as it involves something very close to it, in a form which might be used to control large populations. The propaganda aspect of "humanitarian warfare" is merely a sideshow; it's the technology itself that enlists the enthusiasm of Pentagon planners and law enforcement officials. Much of this "friendly force" technology involves electromagnetic fields and directed-energy radiation, and ultrasound or infrasound weapons -- the same tech-nology that's currently of interest in brain-stimulation and mind-control research.
A partial list of aggressive promoters of this new technology includes Oak Ridge National Lab, Sandia National Laboratories, Science Applications International Corporation, MITRE Corporation, Lawrence Livermore National Lab, and Los Alamos National Laboratory. In the 1996 defense authorization bill, Congress earmarked $37.2 million to investigate non-lethal technologies. And this money looks like a mere ante in the game.
U.S. interest in this "less-than-lethal" technology dates back to the early 1960s, when the State Department became aware of low-energy microwave radiation directed at the U.S. embassy in Moscow. Under the name "Project Pandora," secret research into the Moscow radiation continued for ten years -- before embassy employees were informed that they were on the receiving end. Researchers initially assumed that the microwaves were designed to activate bugging devices. But when a large number of illnesses were reported at the embassy, a review of Soviet scientific journals revealed that the Soviets believed microwaves affected cell membranes and increased the excitability of nerve cells. Officially, the incidence of illness at the embassy was ultimately blamed on the U.S. short-wave transmitting antenna on the embassy roof, which leaked energy and contributed to the unhealthy environment. Still, the secrecy surrounding Project Pandora encouraged further speculation within the U.S. intelligence community and elsewhere. For instance, researchers knew that a low-energy microwave beam could be modulated with an "audiogram," and actually convey a recognizable message into an irradiated brain. This led some U.S. spooks to suspect that the Soviets had been attempting to practice mind control on the embassy staff.
Such history brings us back to the situation of the restless public in our own jittery, pre-millennial U.S. Today, there seems to be a dramatic increase in the number of "wavies," those who feel they are being harassed by non-ionizing radiation such as radio or sound waves. Nevertheless, there is little evidence to support their belief that the secret state, despite its obvious interest in non-lethal technology, is supporting applied research on unsuspecting average citizens. Several alternative explanations suggest themselves.
First of all, the treatment of mental illness over the past few decades has changed dramatically -- from an institutional approach, to an out-patient, community-based system that relies on prescription drugs to control symptoms and behavior. Greater numbers of sufferers of paranoia, freed from institutions, are also free to exercise their First Amendment rights. Furthermore, the power to express oneself has been enhanced by technology -- everything from personal photocopying machines and desktop publishing, to fax machines and now the Internet. And on the Internet, almost everyone can find soul mates.
And "wavies" can make the case that they deserve the benefit of a doubt. Revelations about the Cold War secret state, from the CIA documents released in the 1970s to last year's Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments (which investigated ionizing radiation only), have produced a social environment in which it can seem diffi-cult to rule out anyone's claim, no matter how paranoid-sounding. Finally, there is the modern problem of "pollution" in the broadest sense: from electromagnetic and chemical, and including simple noise. Human reactions to this pollution, which is a new phenomenon in the history of our species, apparently vary by orders of magnitude. Those who are ultra-sensitive may feel harassed, even if no one is intentionally targeting them.
To a disinterested observer, the claims of the "wavies" are perhaps no more bizarre than the claims of those who have experienced profound religious conversions. The point is not to be-little anyone's beliefs, but rather to establish that social factors often determine what we consider to be credible. For thousands of years societies have found it useful to allow sufficient space for religion. Only recently has social space opened up for the claims of "wavies." The increase in their numbers is thus predictable, irrespective of whether the secret state is behind their problems or not. (It isn't, in my opinion.)
This brings us to the "second front" mentioned by Allen Dulles in 1953: the technology of mind control applied on an individual level. Whereas non- ionizing radiation can be "broad-cast" to large populations, techniques such as psychosurgery, implants, and electronic stimulation of the brain (ESB) are administered on a case-by-case basis. More exotic techniques, whose scientific status and potential effectiveness remain uncertain, include radio hypnotic intra-cerebral control and hypnotic dissolution of memory (RHIC-EDOM), and the use of induced "screen memory" and multiple personality disorder (MPD) for cover purposes.
The closest parallel to the "wavies" within this second front include those who feel that implants were forced on them, sometimes during childhood. Such beliefs obviously tap deep fears in the popular psyche. The season premier of "The X Files" showed FBI agent Scully discovering that someone had planted a microchip near the base of her skull. And accused Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh apparently claims that an implant was inserted under his skin, for tracking purposes, during the Gulf War.
Identification implants, which are passive devices that respond to an energy source and return an identification number, are similar to the bar codes at the checkout counter in a grocery store. Today's pet owners can have these devices implanted in their pets. But anyone who confuses this simple technology with a chip that tells them what to do is already in trouble. Such a person should consider turning off the television, logging off the Internet, and checking out a few books from the local library. ID technology is ominous for those concerned with surveillance and privacy, but it has little to do with mind control.
Granted, there are experimental "stimoceiver" implants that can stimulate the brain through electrodes. Mind-control enthusiast Jose Delgado became briefly famous when he stopped a charging bull in its tracks with such a device in 1964. Even allowing for electronic miniaturization since then, or for the fact that finely-tuned microwaves can achieve the same results as implanted electrodes, ESB would still seem to impractical as a mind-control device. At best it appears to stimulate various emotions, and might be used for behavioral conditioning in a controlled environment. This is still quite crude as a control device. It would be simpler and more reliable to arrange a fatal accident.
The combination of surveillance technology and implanted aversion therapy conjures up the vision of a society of victim-robots, with monitors on every utility pole and computers administering the conditioning. But the necessary infrastructure would be frightfully expensive. And no doubt unnecessary. Suffi-cient control over the flow of information in society can yield results very similar to those that could be achieved by mind-control implants installed in every individual. Thus the flaw in the reasoning of many researchers: the mind-control techniques that have them so worried are usually the most difficult techniques one can possibly imagine. For those who would seek total control, plain, old-fashioned information control -- leavened with a few fascist techniques -- will do nicely, thank you.
In 1973, former MKULTRA researcher Louis Jolyon "Jolly" West, from the Department of Psychiatry at UCLA, convinced California and federal officials to sponsor a Violence Center. Governor Ronald Reagan mentioned the proposed Center in glowing terms in a speech on January 11, and the federal Law Enforcement Assistance Administration (LEAA) approved a $750,000 grant. By this time the federal government, through LEAA, the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), the Bureau of Prisons, and the CIA, was operating or funding numerous behavior modification programs in prisons, schools, and hospitals. In response to protests from UCLA students and faculty, the LEAA announced that it would ban the use of its funds for "psychosurgery, medical research, behavior modification -- including aversion therapy -- and chemotherapy."
A year later Louis West was still hoping to obtain funds from NIMH, but by then it was too late for his proposal. Until the 1970s it was not unusual for mental health professionals to propose programs that would screen children for the purpose of early diagnosis and treatment of the potentially violent. But by the 1970s the trend was in the other direction, as some states enacted laws that made it more difficult to confine someone involuntarily as a mental patient. By the 1990s the shoe is securely on the other foot.
Twenty years ago it was fashionable for clinicians to blame urban unrest and similar phenomena on the behavior of individuals. Now, however, the individual can disclaim responsibility for his actions by blaming external agencies. Numerous persons have gone public with accusations of strange events during their childhood, suggesting that they were used as guinea pigs for mysterious men in white coats. Some of their evidence seems sufficiently solid to require further investigation, and more cases are emerging all the time.
On 15 March 1995, two patients of New Orleans therapist Valerie Wolf testified before the Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments. Although this was outside the purview of the Committee, they were permitted to testify because some of the names of CIA-connected researchers they mentioned were already familiar to the Committee. These two women remembered sessions when they were around eight years old that involved electric shocks, hypnosis, shots with needles, x-rays, sexual abuse, and even training in intelligence tradecraft. One case occurred from 1972-1976 and the other in 1958. This testimony was not covered by the media.
Although the recollections of the two women were spontaneous and did not involve regression therapy, there is also a cottage industry developing around memories of child abuse in general. For the most part these are not connected with government research, and perhaps many are the result of question- able techniques used by social workers, therapists, police and prosecutors to elicit testimony from children. Juries are becoming more skeptical of many of these cases. This issue has even assumed the dimensions of a religious crusade -- Christian fundamentalists worry about evil in the New Age movement, and are on the lookout for cases of "satanic ritual abuse" of children. Others believe the CIA has turned children into split-personality sex slaves for operational use.
In 1992 the False Memory Syndrome Foundation began in Philadelphia. This organization criticizes the practice of regression therapy when it's used to bring out memories of traumatic childhood experiences. FMSF considers these repressed memories of incest and sexual abuse to be objectively false, and devastating to family life in general. There's a growing split over this issue among psychology professionals. To confuse the situation further, FMSF has some on their Board of Advisors who may want to cover up their own work. One is Louis West, another is Martin Orne, one of the key MKULTRA researchers in hypnosis, and a third is Michael Persinger, who did research on the effects of electromagnetic radiation on the brain for a Pentagon weapons project.
Regression therapy could be a threat to the techniques the CIA may have secretly developed involving the use of hypnosis. Shortly after Pearl Harbor, George Estabrooks, chairman of the Department of Psychology at Colgate University, was called to Washington by the War Department. As one of the leading authorities on hypnosis, Estabrooks was asked to evaluate how it might be used by the enemy. In 1943 he wrote a book, expanded in a second edition fourteen years later, that included a discussion of the use of hypnotism in warfare. In his opinion, one in five adult humans are capable of being placed in a trance so deep that they will have no memory of it. They could be hypnotized secretly by using a disguised technique, and given a post-hypnotic suggestion. Estabrooks suggested that a dual personality could be constructed with hypnosis, thereby creating the perfect double agent with an unshakable cover. Estabrooks' theories regarding hypnosis are disputed by many experts today. Frequently the entire topic is dismissed with the notion, promoted by Martin Orne and others, that a hypnotist cannot induce a person to perform an act that this person would otherwise find objectionable. But this in itself appears to be a cover story; if the trance is deep enough, an imaginary social environment can be constructed through which an otherwise objectionable act becomes necessary and heroic. Murdering Hitler during wartime would not be considered criminal, for example. It may even be easier than this: in 1951 in Denmark, Palle Hardrup robbed a bank and killed a guard, and then claimed that hypnotist Bjorn Nielsen told him to do it. Nielsen eventually confessed that Hardrup was a test of his hypnotic techniques, which included telling Hardrup that the money from the robbery was a means to a noble end. Hardrup had become Nielsen's robot, and Nielsen was convicted.
In 1976 a book by Donald Bain titled "The Control of Candy Jones" was published by Playboy Press. This one-of-a-kind book is the story Candy Jones, who was America's leading cover girl during the forties and fifties. In 1960 Jones fell on hard times and agreed to act as a courier for the CIA. An excellent subject for hypnosis, Jones became the plaything of a CIA psychiatrist who used her to exhibit his mastery of mind-control techniques. This psychiatrist used hypnosis and drugs to develop a second personality within Jones over a period of 12 years. This second personality took the form of a courier who could be triggered by telephone with particular sounds, and after the mission was completed and the normal personality resumed, did not remember anything.
These missions were elaborate, and frequently involved world travel to deliver messages. According to the book, Jones and other victims were once even subjected to torture at a seminar at CIA headquarters, as a means of demonstrating this psychiatrist's control over his subjects.
Jones married New York radio talk-show host Long John Nebel in 1972. An amateur hypnotist, Nebel stumbled onto her secret personality, and began unraveling the story over many subsequent sessions. Author Donald Bain, a family friend, was invited to reconstruct the story from more than 200 hours of taped sessions between Jones and Nebel. Various researchers have confirmed some pieces of the story, but Bain did not name the major CIA psychiatrist involved, nor did he name a second psychiatrist who Martin Cannon recently identified this second psychiatrist as the late William Kroger, who was an associate of Louis West, Martin Orne, and another MKULTRA veteran, H.J. Eysenck. Whatever the truth is behind Candy Jones -- and it's difficult to see the book as an elaborate hoax -- there's no question that hypnotist George Estabrooks raised issues that the CIA took seriously in secret research for at least 25 years. The MKULTRA implementing documents specified that "additional avenues to the control of human behavior" were to include "radiation, electroshock, various fields of psychology, sociology, and anthropology, graphology, harassment substances, and paramilitary devices and materials." The word "radiation" gave the Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments a reason to request a search of records on human experimentation from the CIA. Their final report, released last October, expressed dissatisfaction with the CIA's response, and recommended that the CIA get their act together so that legitimate requests can be accommodated better in the future.
One problem is the compartmentation of the CIA's record-keeping systems. Another is that the CIA immediately decided that the Committee's purview was restricted only to ionizing radiation -- the type of radiation of interest in nuclear testing, as opposed to the electromagnetic and sound waves that might be used for mind control. Finally, those documents that the CIA did release were heavily redacted. The Committee noted that they had "received numerous queries about MKULTRA and the other related programs from scholars, journalists, and citizens who have
JOINT HEARING BEFORE THE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE AND THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON HEALTH AND SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH OF THE COMMITTEE ON HUMAN RESOURCES
UNITED STATES SENATE NINETY-FIFTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION AUGUST 3, 1977 Printed for the use of the Select Committee on Intelligence and Committee on Human Resources U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON: 1977 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 Stock No. 052-070-04357-1
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas President Judge Louis J. Farina Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Judge James P. Cullen Lancaster County Detective Michael Landis MIND CONTROL and the Black Budget Program MKultra.
INTELLIGENCER JOURNAL (LANCASTER, PA.) February 4, 2004, Wednesday SECTION: NEWS, Pg. A-1 LENGTH: 938 words HEADLINE: Convicted killer says he's conspiracy victim; Judge hears testimony on Zook's mental state BYLINE: Thomas L. Flannery
Convicted killer Robert P. Zook Jr. took the stand Tuesday during the second day of a hearing to determine if he is mentally capable of helping his attorney's efforts to get him off death row Zook was convicted of two counts of first-degree murder in 1986 and sentenced to death for killing 55-year-old typewriter repairman Paul Conard and the repairman's 19-year-old girlfriend, Sandra Wiker, during a botched robbery at Conard's North Queen Street shop.
On Tuesday, under questioning by his attorney, James Moreno of the Defender Association of Philadelphia, Zook told Farina he is an innocent man.
Zook said his attorneys are trying to have him executed as part of a conspiracy concocted by former District Attorney Joseph Madenspacher, now a county judge, and retired Lancaster Bureau of Police Chief Michael Landis, now a county detective. Zook claims the two men plotted with the "radio community" and had transmitters implanted in his head and abdomen. The transmitters, Zook said, have been used to monitor his every move and record his thoughts and his speech. He said the recordings are listened to by a bevy of "outlaw radio stars" that populate the county.
Zook, a hulking man who weighs about 300 pounds and is fully tattooed, told Moreno he has no idea who killed Conard and Wiker, his distant cousin.
"Did the "radio community' set you up?" Moreno asked.
"Yes sir," Zook said. Zook was polite, calm and deliberate as he talked about a conspiracy that extended to his entire family and included Moreno. Zook told Farina he knows about the implants because of the images he sees from behind his eyelids, and voices that speak to him from the implants. On Tuesday, Philadelphia psychiatrist Dr. Robert Sodoff testified that Zook's mental status has deteriorated to a point where Zook is so delusional and distrustful of Moreno that he cannot assist in his own defense. Sodoff told Farina that Zook believes he has a computer chip implanted in his head and a two-way transmitter in his abdomen so authorities can monitor his every move and communicate with him, all part of an elaborate plot Moreno helped concoct in 1979. In 1979, Moreno was a college freshman. Sodoff also said it is highly unlikely Zook has been faking his delusions for more than five years, when they first surfaced.
A psychiatrist called by the defense Tuesday agreed with Sodoff's assessment. However, Dr. Timothy Michaels, a forensic psychiatrist called by Deputy Attorney General Jonelle Eshbach, who is prosecuting Zook at the appellate level, said Zook, despite the alleged delusions, can cooperate and help his attorneys -- if he so chooses. Michaels said Zook does not "want to be crazy." He said Zook "can effectively think, reason, understand and cooperate with his attorneys." Under questioning by Moreno, Michaels said he was the only physician to ever examine Zook who did not conclude Zook was psychotic. "His delusional progression is not consistent with mental illness," Michaels said. If Zook is psychotic, Michaels said, the psychosis he allegedly suffers related to the implanted chip and transmitter does not impair his ability to aid in his own defense. This week's hearing was ordered by the state Supreme Court, which is considering an appeal filed by Zook of a November 1999 ruling by county Judge Louis Farina. At that time, Farina dismissed an appeal Zook had filed seeking relief under the state's Post Conviction Relief Act. Zook asked Farina to overturn the death sentence and resentence him to life in prison. Zook claimed he was not properly represented during his two separate murder trials held here in the 1980s. In 1989, the state Supreme Court ruled Zook's first trial was flawed and overturned the conviction, ordering a second trial. The U.S. Supreme Court denied the county's appeal of the state Supreme Court's ruling. On Jan. 12, 1990, Zook was convicted a second time of two counts of first-degree murder and again was sentenced to death. Zook's defense team took an automatic appeal to the state Supreme Court, but the state's top court upheld the verdict and sentence.
On March 24, 1995, Moreno filed Zook's filed first PCRA appeal in state court. The hearing on the 1995 PCRA filing hearing was set to begin in May 1998, but was delayed until January 1999. During the 1999 hearing before Farina, Moreno argued that Zook was not adequately represented by attorney James P. Cullen during his first trial, nor by attorney Vincent Quinn during his second trial. Cullen currently is a Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas judge. Quinn, now in private practice, was the chief counsel for the state's Judicial Conduct Board.
According to the motion for a new trial Farina denied in 1999, Zook claimed both Cullen and Quinn failed to introduce medical evidence about his alleged mental illness during the penalty phase of the 1986 and 1990 trials that may have led the jury to impose a life sentence instead of the death penalty.
The malady, Moreno said in 1999, was caused by brain damage Zook allegedly suffered during a prison scuffle prior to the murders, the abuse he suffered at the hands of his parents and Zook's history of heavy methamphetamine, marijuana, alcohol and crack cocaine use. After the testimony concluded Tuesday afternoon, Farina did not rule on the matter. The Supreme Court requires a written opinion.
Zook also is serving a separate 25-to-50-year sentence for beating an elderly man during a robbery at a Manheim Township bowling alley.
GRAPHIC: PHOTO, Robert Zook; 1985 photo
COMPLAINT TO U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL re: Fulton Bank and Lancaster County Sheriff, et. al.,
*Complaint was recieved by U.S. Certified Mail on December 9, 2008.
Average Fees and Costs to Homeowners During A Foreclosure by U.S. Congress
** "A report by the Joint Economic Committee of Congress estimates that the average cost of a foreclosure, to the homeowner, lender, local government, and neighbors (whose homes decline in value), is $78,000. By contrast, preventing the foreclosure would cost $3,300 per home on average. Here's how the report breaks out that figure among various "stakeholders":
** Average Cost for Foreclosure to Homeowner: $7,200 "
Stanley J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group, was assessed and charged over $48,000.00 constituting fraud; theft by deception; embezzlement; extortion; and other federal crimes.
Realty Transfer Fees $ 3,698.00 Interest Expense $ 9,363.13 Lancaster County Sheriff Costs $ 5,012.57 Barley Snyder Legal Costs $27,610.44 Barley Snyder Attorney Fee $ 3,000.00 ---------------------------------------------- TOTAL $48,693.14
November 12, 2008
United States Department of Justice Attorney General Office Eastern District Pennsylvania Suite 1250 615 Market Street Philadelphia, PA 19106-4476
Re: Citizen Report Form from STANLEY J. CATERBONE and ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, Pro Se
· FULTON BANK et. al., · Fulton Bank of Lancaster Pennsylvania · Craig Roda, President Fulton Bank · R. Scott Smith, Jr., Chief Financial Officer, Fulton Financial · Shawn M. Long, Esq., Barley Snyder, LLC · Law Firm of Barley Snyder, LLC · Lancaster County Sheriff Department of Lancaster, Pennsylvania · Lancaster County Sheriff Terry Bergman · Lancaster County District Attorney Craig Stedman · Lancaster County Bail Supervision Office · Magisterial District Judge Leo Eckert, Jr. · Magisterial District Judge Dennis Commins, Esq., · Fulton Financial Corporation of Lancaster County · Chief of Police John Fiorill of the Southern Regional Police Department · Adam Cramer of the Southern Regional Police Department, Conestoga, PA · D. Patrick Zimmerman, Solicitor of the Lancaster County Sheriff · James D. McCullough, Deputy Prothonotary, Pennsylvania Superior Court · Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Judge James P. Cullen · Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Judge Michael Georgelis · Central Penn Property Services, Inc., · Parula Properties · Noble Real Estate
FEDERAL CRIMINAL JURISDICTION: criminal fraud, theft by deception, diversion of funds and embezzlement; RICO; mail fraud; civil conspiracy to commit fraud; mortgage fraud; obstruction of due process re Superior Court Appeal of Fulton Bank Judgment; abuse of process; unjust enrichment; discrimination; anti-trust violations.
1.Stanley J. Caterbone appeared pro se for all of these proceedings.
2.A formal letter and complaint was filed in the Lancaster County District Attorney Office to Mr. Craig Stedman on June 18, 2008; the complaint acknowledged but was never responded to by Mr. Craig Stedman or anyone in the Office of the Lancaster County District Attorney.
3.A formal complaint was filed with the Lancaster County Commissioners to President Commissioner Mr. Dennis Stuckey on September 18, 2008; again Mr. Dennis Stuckey acknowledged the complaint and promised a report and or an explanation, but never fufilled his promise.
4.Fulton Bank is a fiduciary for the Lancaster County Sheriff’s Department and the Lancaster County Clerk of Courts and holds checking accounts for both Lancaster County Departments.
5.The JUDGMENT of June 29, 2006; the SHERIFF SALE of December 20, 2006 and the DEED of February 1, 2007 all have been executed without proper jurisdiction and/or improper authority for Case No. Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas CI-06-02271 (Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone).
6.There are missing funds that were not accounted for and should have been paid out from the Sheriff Sale of 220 Stone Hill Road, Conestoga, PA; Case No. Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas CI-06-02271 (Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone).
7.Fulton Bank was the original Mortgage of $103,000 taken out in 1995.
8.The Lancaster County Sheriff’s Solicitor D. Patrick Zimmerman held the sale proceeds in escrow until disbursement; Case No. Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas CI-06-02271 (Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone).
9.The outstanding balance of the Fulton Bank Mortgage of 220 Stone Hill Road was $88,568.00 at the time of foreclosure in March of 2006; Case No. Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas CI-06-02271 (Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone).
10.The Judgment of $97,425.00 of July 31, 2006 included $3,000 for legal fees; Case No. Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas CI-06-02271 (Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone).
11.There were no liens on the deed or real estate. 12.On June 29, 2006 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Judge Michael Georgelis abused is power and did not have proper jurisdiction to rule in the case no. Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas CI-06-02271 (Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone); due to the fact that the Petition to Set Aside the Mortgage filed by Fulton Bank in the Stanley J. Caterbone Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Case No. 05-23059 was under appeal in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania under Judge Anita Brody; Case No. 1538-2006.
12.The appeal was not ruled upon until July 17, 2006. Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Judge Michael Georgelis new this from the Answer to Complaint filed on May 6, 2006 by Stanley J. Caterbone. Instead Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Judge Michael Georgelis committed collusion, obstruction of due process and obstruction of justice in the following ruling: “The motion is deemed unopposed for the Defendant’s failure to file a responsive brief, L.C.R.C.P. No. 1034(a)D.” Stanley J. Caterbone refused to file a response due to these facts and was awaiting a ruling in the appeal for the Petition to Set Aside the Mortgage, case no. 1538-2006 in the U.S. District for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
13.On July 31, 2006 Attorney Shawn M. Long, Esq., of Barley Snyder, LLC committed perjury and a count of unsworn falsification to authorities filed an AFFADAVIT PURSUANT TO RULE 3129.1 with the Lancaster County Prothonotary; Case No. Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas CI-06-02271 (Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone). Item No. 7. states “Name and address of every other person of whom the plaintiff has knowledge who as any interest in the property which may be affected by the sale: Lancaster County Tax Claim Bureau; Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Revenue; Internal Revenue Service”.
The above named entities had no interest in the property, nor was Stanley J. Caterbone delinquent with any income or sales taxes at or near the time of the affidavit; nor did he have any communications with such entities prior to the statement. The following statement was signed by Shawn M. Long, Esq., “I verify that the statements made in this affidavit are true and correct to the best of my personal knowledge or information and belief. I understand that false statements herein are made subject to penalties of 17 Pa. C.S. Section 4904 relating to unsworn falsification to authorities”.
14.Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Judge Michael Georgelis filed an OPINION on September 5, 2006; Case No. Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas CI-06-02271 (Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone), stating that “The Defendant appealed my June 29, 2006 Order granting the Plaintiff’s Motion for Judgment on the pleadings, and he was directed to file a Pa.R.A.P. 1925(b) statement by August 25, 2006. He as not done so, and accordingly, I believe he has waived any appeal issues”. The fact of the matter is that Stanley J. Caterbone had never received the ORDER from the Lancaster County Prothonotary. This has happened on several occasions and is well documented of Stanley J. Caterbone’s mail being diverted; withheld; or not serviced at all. All other court orders and filing requirements were met up until this time, which is highly suspect.
15.On or about December 12, 2006 Southern Regional Police Chief John Fiorill confronted Stanley J. Caterbone during a summary appeal in the Lancaster County Courthouse and tried to persuade Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Judge Michael Perezous to ORDER Stanley J. Caterbone to change his address from 220 Stone Hill Road, Conestoga, Pennsylvania to the Lancaster County Prison because the U.S.P.S Post Office in Conestoga was tired of holding his mial while illegally imprisoned at the Lancaster County Prison. This was only one week prior to the Sheriff Sale of December 20, 2006 and was maliciously attempted so that the defendants could say Stanley J. Caterbone abandoned his property. Stanley J. Caterbone refused to change his address, and Judge Perezous would not here any further discussion of the matter.
16.The Sheriff illegally sold the property to Central Penn Property Services of Akron, PA for $156,000 on December 20, 2006 without a certified judgment from the courts due to Pennsylvania Superior Court Appeal of the Judgment Case No. 1463 MDA 2006; Case No. Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas CI-06-02271 (Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone) and due to the fact that the original JUDGMENT Ordered by Lancaster County Common Pleas Judge Michael Georgelis was not valid because he did not have proper jurisdiction; see Item No. 11 of this document.
17.On January 8, 2006 Stanley J. Caterbone filed an insurance claim for theft of the real estate and theft of the contents of 220 Stone Hill Road, Conestoga, Pennsylvania with Harleysville Insurance Company, Claim No. MO-702274-ZS.
18.On January 30, 2006 Shawn Long, Esq., of Barley Snyder LLC, as counsel for Fulton Bank filed a NOTICE OF APPEARANCE BEFORE BUSINESS JUDGE (Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. CI-07-00019 (Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone and CI-06-02271 (Stanley J. Caterbone/Advanced Media Group v. Fulton Bank, et. al.,) for a hearing scheduled on February 1, 2007 before Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Judge James Cullen at 10:00. The NOTICE contained FULTON BANK’S RESPONSE TO STANLEY J. CATERBONE’S PETITION TO SET ASIDE REAL ESTATE. The NOTICE was served via U.S.P.S. regular mail to Stanley J. Caterbone and received on January 31, 2007 at approximately 3:30pm.
19.Item No. 21 of the FULTON BANK’S RESPONSE TO STANLEY J. CATERBONE’S PETITION TO SET ASIDE REAL ESTATE (Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. CI-07-00019 (Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone and CI-06-02271 (Stanley J. Caterbone/Advanced Media Group v. Fulton Bank, et. al.,); contains a perjured statement and fraud which states: “Such protections included, among other things, his opportunity to answer Fulton Bank’s Complaint and to respond to the Bank’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings and his unsuccessful appeal to the Pennsylvania Superior Court with respect to the Judgment entered in the Foreclosure Case”.
The fact of the matter is that the last docket entry up until December 20, 2006 and including January 30, 2007 is the MEMORANDUM dated October 30, 2006 which sites Pa. R.A.P. 124 & 2171 Method of Reproduction and states OTHER – We need 7 copies of this brief, also all copies need to be bound on the left like a book and if you use staples they must be covered with tape”. Copied to Mr. Shawn Long, Esq., Stanley J. Caterbone never received the MEMORANDUM which was held in the Conestoga Post Office until January 4, 2007.
20. Item No. 19 and 20 of the FULTON BANK’S RESPONSE TO STANLEY J. CATERBONE’S PETITION TO SET ASIDE REAL ESTATE (Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. CI-07-00019 (Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone and CI-06-02271 (Stanley J. Caterbone/Advanced Media Group v. Fulton Bank, et. al.,); also contains perjured statements and fraud which states: “While “proper cause” is not defined for purposes of Pa. R.C.P. 3132, the terms of the rule, however, contemplate a broad discretion in the court and the court’s determination on whether to set aside the execution sale will be governed by the particular facts of the case at hand. Goodrich Amram 2d §3125:5. As a general rule, the power to set aside will be exercised whenever necessary to avoid injustice to an aggrieved party, such as where failure to comply with the provisions of the execution Rules results in prejudice to any party in interest.” And then Item 20 states: The realty of this matter is that Caterbone has fully enjoyed all of the due process protections provided by the United States Constitution and Pennsylvania law throughout the Foreclosure Case, as is shown by the record.” See this documents No.’s 9;10;14;16;17;18;19;20;21;22;23;24;25;26;27;28;29;30;31;32.
21.Furthermore all of the court cases that have claimed causes of actions dealing with any of these issues have been adjudicated with abuse of discretion, abuse of power; abuse of process; fraud; perjury; prosecutorial misconduct; judicial misconduct; and federal criminal statutes under RICO (Racketeering In Corruption Act).
22.On January 4, 2007 Stanley J. Caterbone visited the U.S.P.S. Conestoga Post Office and retrieved all the mails including the MEMORANDUM from the Pennsylvania Superior Court Case No. 1463 MDA 2006 (Appeal of the June 29th 2006 JUDGMENT Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. CI-07-00019 (Stanley J. Caterbone/Advanced Media Group v. Fulton Bank, et al., and CI-06-02271 Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone).; and submitted the requested copies on January 9, 2007.
23.On January 4, 2007 Mr. James D. McCullough, Deputy Prothonotary committed collusion and conspiracy to commit fraud by filing a certified ORDER of Pennsylvania Superior Court Case No. 1463 MDA 2006 Per Curiam stating “AND NOW, the fourth day of January, 2007 this matter is dismissed for failure to file a brief”; in Pennsylvania Superior Court Case No. 1463 MDA 2006 (Appeal of the June 29th 2006 JUDGMENT Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. CI-07-00019 (Stanley J. Caterbone/Advanced Media Group v. Fulton Bank, et al., and CI-06-02271 Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone).
24.On January 4, 2007 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Judge James P. Cullen committed collusion and conspiracy to commit fraud when Stanley J. Caterbone entered an oral motion for continuance of the criminal court proceedings for criminal case no. 3179-2006 in the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas; in order to deal with the theft of his legal and business property, and the contents of 220 Stone Hill Road, Conestoga, which were at the very moment being stolen and loaded into 2 Penske trucks. Judge James P. Cullen denied the motion and would not lend any credibility to the account for the record of the preceding.
25.Stanley J. Caterbone received a forwarded postmark of January 11, 2007 containing the January 4, 2007 ORDER to dismiss Pennsylvania Superior Court case no. 1463 MDA the Appeal of the Fulton Bank Judgment for the Foreclosure; (Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone and CI-06-02271).
26.The preceding proves that at the time of the Sheriff Sale on December 20, 2006 the Judgment was not certified due to the Appeal of the Judgment in the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, and furthermore was still under Appeal, thus making the Sheriff Sale of December 20, 2006 illegal; Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. CI-06-02271 (Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone).
27.Lancaster County Court Common Pleas Judge Michael Georgelis committed collusion; conspiracy to commit fraud; obstruction of due process; and abuse of power by signing the ORDER dated February 1, 2007 which DENIED the Petition to Set Aside the Sale WITH PREJUDICE without granting Stanley J. Caterbone the opportunity to state his case and submit a formal written REPLY to the Fulton Bank RESPONSE recorded on January 31, 2007; Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. CI-07-00019 (Stanley J. Caterbone/Advanced Media Group v. Fulton Bank, et al.,
28.Magisterial District Justice Leo Eckert, Jr., Officer Cramer of the Southern Regional Police Department, the Lancaster County Bail Supervision Office, and Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Judge Paul K. Allison all colluded and committed conspiracy to commit fraud with the illegal detention of Stanley J. Caterbone from October 30, 2006 until after the Sheriff Sale of December 20, 2006 until the release due to his successful Appeal on December 29, 2006. Stanley J. Caterbone should have been released on November 1, 2006 under unsecured bail, as stated and recorded in court filings.
29.On February 1, 2007 D. Patrick Zimmerman committed collusion and conspiracy to commit fraud by distributing the proceeds of the Sheriff Sale to Fulton Bank. D. Patrick Zimmerman also committed fraud with respect to the escrow account.
30.Stanley J. Caterbone received a check for $17,306.80 on February 2, 2007 from the proceeds of the December 20, 2006 Sheriff Sale; Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. CI-07-00019 (Stanley J. Caterbone/Advanced Media Group v. Fulton Bank, et al., and CI-06-02271 Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone).
31.The 1099 from Fulton Bank to the IRS listed the fair market value at $250,000 and the property transferred for $195,000 on March 13, 2007. 32. The deed recorded in the Lancaster County Deeds Office listed Parula Properties as the owner, when Central Penn Property Services was the rightful winning bidder on December 20, 2006; Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. CI-07-00019 (Stanley J. Caterbone/Advanced Media Group v. Fulton Bank, et al., and CI-06-02271 Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone).
33.The Lancaster County Sheriff took some $5,021.57 in fees for the execution of the Sheriff Sale, yet the Prothonotary states the actual fees were only $2,676.25; Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. CI-07-00019 (Stanley J. Caterbone/Advanced Media Group v. Fulton Bank, et al., and CI-06-02271 Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone).
34.Fulton Bank was paid approximately $98,000 in monthly mortgages payments during the time period of 1995 thru default in July of 2005 and received approximately $122,000.00 from the proceeds of the Sheriff Sale resulting in approximately $220,000 over 10 years on a $103,000 mortgage; Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. CI-07-00019 (Stanley J. Caterbone/Advanced Media Group v. Fulton Bank, et al., and CI-06-02271 Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone).
35.During the Sheriff Sale of December 20, 2006 the Fulton Bank Foreclosure was under appeal in the Superior Court of Pennsylvania as Case No. 1463 MDA 2006; Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. CI-07-00019 (Stanley J. Caterbone/Advanced Media Group v. Fulton Bank, et al., and CI-06-02271 Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone).
36.There was never any eviction notice served upon Stanley J. Caterbone, whom had every conceivable legal right to keep possession of the property through the period of February 1, 2007 and as the Fulton Bank Mortgage Agreement outlines, an Eviction Notice would have had to have been properly served to remove Stanley J. Caterbone after February 1, 2007; Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. CI-07-00019 (Stanley J. Caterbone/Advanced Media Group v. Fulton Bank, et al., and CI-06-02271 Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone).
37.All legal files of all Lancaster County Commonwealth Court; the Superior Court of Pennsylvania; the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for Eastern Pennsylvania; the U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals; local District Magistrates; all business files for the Advanced Media Group; and all personal files were also stolen from December 4, 2008 until April 13, 2007.
38.Parula Properties committed criminal trespass and burglary by illegally entering the property prior to the settlement of February 1, 2007 and removing all of the contents, including a 1991 Dodge Pick-up truck and trailer; Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. CI-07-00019 (Stanley J. Caterbone/Advanced Media Group v. Fulton Bank, et al., and CI-06-02271 Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone and Criminal Division Case No. MD 879-2007 Petition for Review).
39.All possessions were stolen and not recovered until April 13, 2007 when Harleysville Insurance demanded the return of the items and contents of 220 Stone Hill Road, Conestoga, PA 17516; Claim No. MO-702274-ZS of Harleysville Insurance Company of Moorestown, New Jersey.
40.Harleysville Insurance Company of Moorestown, New Jersey was settled under Claim No. MO-702274-ZS for stolen property that was not retrieved or returned and did so using undo influence and extortion for not including all items that were stolen or vandalized.
41.Parula Properties and or Harleysville Insurance could not account for 4 or 5 boxes of daily Time Management Calendars and large Desktop Calendars; as well as other business and legal files; and personal and business possessions.
42.Related Court Cases with Fulton Bank and Lancaster County Sheriff’s Department:
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas o Case No. CI-06-00019 o Case No. CI-06-00150 o Case No. CI-06-00366 o Case No. CI-06-02271 o Criminal Division Case No. MD 879-2007 Petition for Review
Superior Court of Pennsylvania o Case No. 1463 MDA 2006 o Case No. 951 MDA 2007 o Case No. 950 MDA 2007
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania o Case No. 248 MDA 2007 o Case No. 432 MT 2007 o Case No. 433 MT 2007
U.S. Bankruptcy Court o Case No. 05-23059
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania o Case No. 05-2288 o Case No. 06-4650 o Case No. CA-06-1538
U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals o Case No. 07-4474 o Case No. 07-4475
Stan J. Caterbone Advanced Media Group
AUDIT OF 220 STONE HILL ROAD SHERIFF SALE PROCEEDS AND CLOSING COST TRANSACTIONS
July 20, 2006 – JUDGMENT COURT ORDER $97,425.07
Plus continuing interest after March 2, 2006 @ $14.56 per diem; as stated Plus continuing late charges and costs pursuant to June 29, 2006 ORDER; as stated
July 31, 2006 – PRAECIPE WRIT OF EXECUTION
Principal $88, 568.53; as stated Interest to 03/02/2006 @ $14.53 = $4,442.96; as stated Negative Escrow Balance = $1,096.38; as stated Late Charges = $317.20; as stated Attorney Fee = $3,000.00; as stated
January 2, 2007 – WRIT RETURNED
To Prothonotary, Sheriff fees in the amount of $3,340.62 paid and a refund check in the amount of 2,676.25, ck 66219 dated February 1, 2007 was mailed to Barley Snyder same date.; as stated
January 19, 2007 – SHERIFF SCHEDULE OF DISTRIBUTION WRIT OF EXECUTION EX CI-06-02271
o Proceeds of Sale = $156,000.00; as stated o Deduct Cost = $ 5,021.57; as stated o Balance = $150,000.00; as stated o Delinquent Taxes = None; as stated o 2006 County Municipal & School Taxes = Paid; as stated o Water/Sewer – on site, not public N/A; as stated o Realty Transfer Taxes – Recorder of Deeds $3,699.00 o Mtg. Payoff to Barley Snyder of Fulton $129,972.59; as stated o Balance of Proceeds – Stanley J. Caterbone $17,306.80; as stated
February 1, 2007 – SHERIFFS DEED LANCASTER COUNTY RECORDER OF DEEDS o State Transfer Real Estate Tax = $1,849.00; as stated o Local Transfer Real Estate Tax = $1,849.00; as stated February 5, 2007 – LETTER FROM ROBERT W. ST. CLAIR, LOAN WORKOUT OFFICER FOR FULTON BANK o Principal = $88,568.53; as stated o Interest = $9,363.13; as stated o Negative Escrow = $3,827.81; as stated o Late Fees = $ 602.68; as stated o Legal Fees and Costs = $27,610.44; as stated
March 13, 2007 – LANCASTER COUNTY RECORDER OF DEEDS
220 Stone Hill Road, Conestoga, PA transfers from Parula Properties to Stoltzfus’ for $195,000.00
March 13, 2007 – FULTON BANK IRS FORM 1099 TO STANLEY J. CATERBONE o Fair Market Value of Real Estate - $250,000; as stated
1. 04/11/2006 – PRAECIPE to reinstate the Complaint originally filed on March 8, 2006 filed by Shawn M. Long, Esq., of Barley Snyder LLC re Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas CI-06-02271 (Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone Mortgage Foreclose).
2. 05/06/2006 – ANSWER TO COMPLAINT filed by Stanley J. Caterbone, appearing pro se for Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas CI-06-02271 (Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone Mortgage Foreclose).
3. 06/06/2006 – PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS filed by Shawn M. Long, Esq., of Barley Snyder LLC re Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas CI-06-02271 (Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone Mortgage Foreclose).
4. 06/29/2006 - ORDER by Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Judge Michael A. Georgelis ORDERED AND DECREED Motion is granted for JUDGMENT re Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas CI-06-02271 (Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone Mortgage Foreclose) for not responding to complaint, which was a false statement.
5. 06/31/2006 – NOTICE OF SHERIFF SALE re Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas CI-06-02271 (Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone Mortgage Foreclose).
6. 07/20/2006 – NOTICE OF ENTRY OF JUDGMENT, ORDER OR DECREE by Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Judge Michael A. Georgelis ORDERED AND DECREED Motion is granted for JUDGMENT re Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas CI-06-02271 (Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone Mortgage Foreclose) for $97,425.07.
7. 07/31/2006 – PRAECIPE FOR WRIT OF EXECUTION filed by Shawn M. Long, Esq., of Barley Snyder LLC re Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas CI-06-02271 (Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone Mortgage Foreclose).
8. 07/31/2006 – NOTICE PURSUANT TO RULE 3129 filed by Shawn M. Long, Esq., of Barley Snyder LLC re Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas CI-06-02271 (Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone Mortgage Foreclose).
9. 07/31/2006 – AFFADAVIT PURSUANT TO RULE 3129.1 filed by Shawn M. Long, Esq., of Barley Snyder LLC re Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas CI-06-02271 (Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone Mortgage Foreclose).
10. 07/28/2006 – ORDER by Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Judge Michael A. Georgelis for a hearing on the In Forma Pauperis Petition of Stanley J. Caterbone re Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas CI-06-02271 (Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone Mortgage Foreclose). This hearing was protested by Stanley J. Caterbone for not being within the Pa.R.C.P.
11. 08/11/2006 – In Form Pauperis APPROVED by Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Judge Michael A. Georgelis.
12. 08/11/2006 - Pa.R.A.P. 1925(a) ORDER by Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Judge Michael A. Georgelis re directed to file concise statement of matters for Superior Court of Pennsylvania case no. 1463 MDA 2006 Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone lower trial court Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas CI-06-02271 (Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone Mortgage Foreclose).
13. 09/05/2006 – Pa.R.A.P. 1925(a) OPINION by Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Judge Michael A. Georgelis.
14. 09/06/2006 – Letter from the Lancaster County Office of the Prothonotary, Court of Common Pleas, Civil re submission of lower trial court record re Superior Court of Pennsylvania case no. 1463 MDA 2006 Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone lower trial court Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas CI-06-02271 (Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone Mortgage Foreclose).
15. 10/26/2006 – BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF APPEAL TO SUPERIOR COURT filed by Stanley J. Caterbone re Superior Court of Pennsylvania case no. 1463 MDA 2006 Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone lower trial court Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas CI-06-02271 (Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone Mortgage Foreclose).
16. 10/30/2006 – MEMORANDUM to Stanley J. Caterbone requesting additional copies of brief stamped and recorded on October 26, 2006 for Superior Court of Pennsylvania case no. 1463 MDA 2006 Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone lower trial court Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas CI-06-02271 (Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone Mortgage Foreclose). Attached envelope with U.S.P.S. postmark of October 30, 2006.
17. 01/04/2007 – Superior Court of Pennsylvania ORDER Dismissal of Superior Court of Pennsylvania case no. 1463 MDA 2006 Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone lower trial court Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas CI-06-02271 (Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone Mortgage Foreclose) and 01/13/2007 – U.S.P.S. forwarding postmark of January 11, 2007 to Stanley J. Caterbone of 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA 17603.
18. 01/09/2007 – Letter to James D. McCullough, Deputy Prothonotary, Superior Court of Pennsylvania; exhibits; and (7) seven copies of brief re case no. 1463 MDA 2006 Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone lower trial court Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas CI-06-02271 (Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone Mortgage Foreclose).
19. 01/11/2008 - Letter from Lancaster County Sheriff Solicitor D. Patrick Zimmerman to Stanley J. Caterbone re schedule and intention to make distribution from sale and delivery of Sheriff’s Deed and request for signed and dated copy of Petition to Set Aside Sale Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas CI-06-00019 (Stanley J. Caterbone/Advanced Media Group v. Fulton Bank, et. al.,). (Already properly served).
20. 01/18/2007 – Hearing with MDJ Stoltzfus re 4 charges and 3 guilty verdicts. Required $965.00 cash or to jail. All convictions overturned during summary appeals in April by Stanley J. Caterbone appearing pro se. Joseph Caterbone loans Stanley J. Caterbone entire amount of fines and costs to avoid prison.
21. 01/18/2007 - Letter from Lancaster County Sheriff Solicitor D. Patrick Zimmerman to Stanley J. Caterbone re schedule and intention to make distribution from sale and delivery of Sheriff’s Deed.
22. 01/30/2007 – NOTICE TO APPEAR BEFORE BUSINESS JUDGE JAMES P. CULLEN and FULTON BANK’S RESPONSE TO STANLEY J. CATERBONE’S PETITION TO SET ASIDE SALE OF REAL ESTATE.
23. 01/25/2007 – Letter from Lancaster County Sheriff Solicitor D. Patrick Zimmerman to Shawn M. Long, Esq., of Barley Snyder LLC and Central Penn Property Services, Inc., of Akron, Pennsylvania re halting of distribution of funds and Sheriff’s Deed due to Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas CI-06-00019 (Stanley J. Caterbone/Advanced Media Group v. Fulton Bank, et. al.,).
24. 02/01/2007 – Lancaster County Sheriff Schedule of Distribution and Fulton Bank check no. 66215 re proceeds from Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas CI-06-02271 (Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone).
25. 02/01/2007 – Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas ORDER by Judge Michael Georgelis Denying Petition to Set Aside Sale (Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas CI-06-00019 (Stanley J. Caterbone/Advanced Media Group v. Fulton Bank, et. al.,).
26. 02/01/2007 – Sheriff Deed re: 220 Stone Hill Road, Conestoga, PA 17516 to Stanley J. Caterbone.
27. 02/05/2007 – Letter from Robert St. Clair, Loan Workout Officer of Fulton Bank, re breakdown of distribution of proceeds from sheriff sale of 220 Stone Hill Road, Conestoga, PA.
28. 02/05/2007 – Reply to Fulton Bank Response to Petition to Set Aside Sale (Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas CI-06-00019 (Stanley J. Caterbone/Advanced Media Group v. Fulton Bank, et. al.,)
29. 02/05/2007 - U.S.P.S. Certificate of Mailing for Reply to Fulton Bank Response to Petition to Set Aside Sale (Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas CI-06-00019 (Stanley J. Caterbone/Advanced Media Group v. Fulton Bank, et. al.,).
30. 02/08/2007 – Fulton Bank IRS Form 1099 re 220 Stone Hill Road, Conestoga, PA 17516 to Stanley J. Caterbone.
31. 05/19/1990 – Lancaster New Era newspaper article containing Fulton Bank relationship with James Guerin and ISC: “To give up “in lieu of fines” the $2 million deposited by Gurein and Parent (Parent Bank/Industries) in a Fulton Bank escrow account to settle a severance pay dispute with former ISC attorney William A. Clark.
32. 09/07/2006 – CERTIFIED LETTER from Shawn M. Long, Esq., of Barley Snyder LLC to Stanley J. Caterbone re Trespass Notice under Section 3503 of the Pennsylvania Crimes Code barring litigant Stanley J. Caterbone from the premises of Barley Snyder LLC at 126 East King Streets, Lancaster, Pennsylvania in order to harass; intimidate; and obstruct due process and justice. No reason was provided.
33. 09/15/2006 - CERTIFIED LETTER from Ronald H. Pollack, Jr., Esq., of Barley Snyder LLC to Stanley J. Caterbone re Trespass Notice under Section 3503 of the Pennsylvania Crimes Code barring litigant Stanley J. Caterbone from the premises of Lancaster Newspapers, Inc., , Lancaster, Pennsylvania in order to harass; intimidate; and obstruct due process and justice. All incidents were fabricated, of course.
34. 11/02/2007 – Letter from Michael L. Landis, Chief County Detective, Office of the District Attorney of Lancaster County, re Private Criminal Complaints filed against Parula Properties, Noble Real Estate, and Central Penn Properties for the stolen contents of 220 Stone Hill Road, Conestoga, Pennsylvania. Attached is the Private Criminal Complaint of September 18, 2007, which was formerly filed and assigned case no. MD 879-2007 Petition for Review in the Criminal Division of the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas.
35. 01/08/2008 - Letter from Stephanie Carfley, Esq., of Barley Snyder LLC re December 13, 2007 and December 21, 2007 letters to R. Scott Smith, Jr., Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Fulton Financial Corporation; and Ethics Point Report complaints re Fulton Bank.
36. 11/08/2008 - Docket Sheet Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas CI-06-00019 (Stanley J. Caterbone/Advanced Media Group v. Fulton Bank, et. al.,
37. 11/08/2008 - Docket Sheet Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas CI-06-02271 (Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone).
38. 01/11/2008 – Letter from Stephanie Carfley, Esq., of Barley Snyder LLC re former employment with Roda & Nast, P.C. and Joseph Roda, Esq., to Stanley J. Caterbone concerning International Signal & Control, PLC (ISC) and the representation of ISC attorney William Clark and the re the severance pay dispute with ISC and James Guerin.
39. 11/14/2007 – Letter from R. Scott Smith, Jr., Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Fulton Financial Corporation re meeting and litigation. 40. 07/02/2008 - U.S. Department of Justice Citizen Report Form.
PRESS RELEASE OF OCTOBER 4, 2008
CATERBONE and ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP WIN IN THE U.S. THIRD CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS IN OPINION (Third Circuit Judges Sloviter, Barry and Nygaard) OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2008:
Defendants: Fulton Bank (Barley Snyder, LLC); Southern Regional Police Department; Lancaster County Prison (Apel & Yost); Lancaster County Sheriff Department; Commonwealth (Mellon) (Cozen O'Conner) Bank; Manhiem Township Police Department (Hartman, Underhill & Brubaker); Avalon Police Department (Segal McCambridge Singer & Mahoney Ltd.,); Stone Harbor Police Department; Etc.,
In The U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals in CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison/Fulton Bank , et. al., (U.S. District Court Case No. 05-2288 and Third Circuit Case No. 07-4474) and also in CATERBONE/ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP v. Mr. Randall O. Wenger, et. al., (U.S. District Court Case No. 06-4650 and Third Circuit Case No. 04-4475);
The U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals VACATED the lower courts DISMISSAL of both cases for not filing an Amended Complaint on Time ; and both cases are now remanded back to the U.S. District Court for further proceedings under Judge Mary A. McLaughlin.
April 22, 2008 - U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals Judges AMBROS, FUENTES, and JORDAN
QUESTIONS – (1) By the Clerk for possible dismissal due to a jurisdictional defect;
(2) By the Clerk for possible dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)* or for possible summary action under I.O.P. 10.6; *Note that the magistrate applied 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) to dismiss the plainly frivolous case sua sponte without requiring the victimized defendants to expend legal fees in responding.
(3) Appellant’s jurisdictional response; (4) Jurisdictional response of Appellee, Fulton Bank; (5) Motion by Appellee, Manheim Township Police Department, to dismiss appeal; and (6) Appellant’s motion for appointment of counsel in the above-captioned case.
“The question of jurisdiction, and the motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, are referred to the merits panel. See I.O.P. 10.3.5. We do not dismiss the appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) or take summary action under I.O.P. 10.6. The Clerk is directed to issue a briefing schedule. We note, however, that this order does not represent a finding of appellate jurisdiction in this matter. As in all cases, the panel of this Court that reviews the appeal on its merits will make a final determination of appellate jurisdiction. In addition to any other issues the parties wish to raise in their briefs, the parties shall address whether the District Court erred in dismissing the case without addressing the factors set forth in Poulis v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 747 F.2d 863 (3d Cir. 1984).
The motion for appointment of counsel is denied.”
September 30, 2008 - U.S. Third Circuit Court Judges SLOVITAR, BARRY, and NYGAARD
QUESTIONS – ORDER of October 22, 2007 by U.S. District Judge Mary A. McLaughlin to DISSMISS both cases WITH PREJUDICE for not filing completed amended complaint.
“ORDERED and ADJUDGED by this Court that the judgments of the District Court entered on October 23, 2007, be and the same are hereby VACATED and the cases are REMANDED for further proceedings. Costs will not be taxed. All of the above in accordance with the opinion of this Court.”
MAJOR NEWS - KARL ROVE HAS HIS FINGERRINTS AND MARKING ALL OVER MY SITUATION! October 2, 2008
I urge you to go out and rent or buy this DVD , unless you already did. This is the MO that I needed. He was here in Lancaster two (2) years ago campaigning for Rick Santorum ( I have to check the dates), who lost to Robert Casey, Jr. for The U.S. Senate Seat. o He made sure he drove by me so that I would see him! o He started bugging offices in the 1970's. o He started counterfeiting documents in the 1970's. o He started breaking into opposition offices in the 1970's. o He was first noticed by George H. W. Bush in the 1970's. o He used the "networking" MO in his college days. o I personally saw him in Lancaster over the past few years. o He has been teaching his "techniques" for years to others. o He had a personal relationship with the FBI and used it to have persons prosecuted and jailed and thinks nothing of ruining someone's life for the Republican Party! o On Tuesday, September 30, 2008 there was a Special Prosecutor named in the Alerbero Gonzales (Former U.S. Attorney General) case regarding the firings of the attorney generals. o The U.S. Department of Justice thinks Karl Rove and Alberto Gonzales should face criminal charges. (click here)
I will update this new information at a later time.
About the Book
Step inside Bush's Brain with this enlightening book by James C. Moore and Wayne Slater
Many Washington insiders believe that the strength of the Bush machine lies not in its leader but in Karl Rove, the man who picked Bush to run for Governor of Texas, tutored him on the workings of government, and ran brilliant yet brutal campaigns that would eventually sweep Bush into the Presidency.
In Bush's Brain: How Karl Rove Made George W. Bush Presidential, readers will enter the powerful world of White House Senior Advisor Karl Rove and learn how this man created George W. Bush and continues to keep him on top. Political journalists James Moore and Wayne Slater offer a rare glimpse into the man who has become the single most important advisor to George W. Bush and the person who many think is calling the shots at the White House. They also discuss how Rove's strategic decisions seem to be determining U.S. policy for the Bush administration, including the controversial tactic of running on a war with Iraq.
This intriguing book also features previously unreported information on the Bush campaign from the primaries and the conventions to the fall general election and the complex relationship Rove and Bush currently share. Karl Rove is both feared and admired by Republicans and Democrats alike. His take no prisoners approach to politics has received mixed reviews and left everyone wondering who's really running this country? In Bush's Brain: How Karl Rove Made George W. Bush Presidential readers will learn who the real Karl Rove is and just how much power he really has.
WACHOVIA AND FULTON BANK CASHIER'S CHECK SCAM OF SEPTEMBER 12, 2008
Fulton Bank and Wachovia Bank tried to confiscate and abscond my Fulton Bank $17,306.80 Cashier's Check made payable to myself, Stan J. Caterbone and guaranteed, on Thursday and Friday September 11th and 12th, 2008; through a conspiracy of theft by deception and fraud.
On Thursday, Fulton Bank at the Penn Square Headquarters refused to open a checking account to accept the $17,306.80 Cashier's Check guaranteed by Fulton Bank themselves, dated September 22, 2007 (See the letter below). By refusing to open the checking account, I had to go to Wachovia Bank, where I had a checking account in good standing for the past year, to deposit the Cashier's Check.
The next day, Friday, I recorded my meeting with the Wachovia Branch Manager regarding the transaction. Wachovia Bank was setting up a discretionary policy of both banks to not honor the guaranteed Fulton Bank Cashier's Check.
The end result would have been that they would have confiscated the actual Fulton Bank Cashier's Check, never credited my account, and charged me overdraft fees for any transactions that I placed on my Wachovia Check Card from the date of deposit.
I would have lost possession of the actual Fulton Bank Cashier's check or $17,306.80; I would have been charged overdraft fees; and they would have closed my checking account due to non-sufficient funds. Ultimately I would have not been able to pay for my monthly hosting fee for this website (can only pay with a credit card or debit card) and this website would have been taken off-line.
I would have gone back to Wachovia Bank and Fulton Bank and argued about who stole my $17,306.80 and one or both of them would have called 911; then since they are both in the City of Lancaster, the Lancaster City Police would have responded with a Crisis Intervention Mental Health Officer and attempted to cite me with disorderly conduct and get a Section 302 Commitment Order signed by the Lancaster County Administrator. Trust me, this was already in the works.
Transcript with Wachovia Bank Branch Manager's Office Corner of Hershey Avenue and Manor Street Lancaster, PA 17603
September 12, 2008 Approximately 10:40 am
Recording approximately 12 minutes in length
[Stan J. Caterbone] I have a Cashie'rs Check here ($17,306.80), now if I deposit this now how does this work with this cashiers check
[Wachovia Bank Branch Manager - Black Male] We have ah next-day availability which means by Saturday morning.
[Stan J. Caterbone] Even though it is Fulton Bank, I can’t have immediate availability?
[Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] Depends on how much you need back?
[Stan J. Caterbone] Till tomorrow? I think like $10.00 dollars.
[Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] ….. Let me look at your account for a minute.
[Stan J. Caterbone] I am eventually going to get another Cashier's Check.
[Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] We can put it on a next day ticket for availability if you want to cash this check, but it is going to take a little bit of time. You have a few overdrafts.
[Stan J. Caterbone] That last overdraft was a bit confusing.
[Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] Are you talking about for this check, we’re talking about ... you’re looking at mayber 2 to 3 business days.
[Stan J. Caterbone] For What?
[Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] Figuring in the overdrafts.
[Stan J. Caterbone] What do you mean, I don’t understand.
[Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] Any check for the day of deposit takes usually 2 to 3 business days.
[Stan J. Caterbone] A Cashier's Check? It’s a Cashier's Check!
[Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] It is going to have to pass through Fulton to make sure Fulton is O.K. with it. That is the reason why.
[Stan J. Caterbone] It’s a Cashiers Check! Well It’s a Cashiers Check!
[Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] Well it is still … Fulton, everybody has their own Cashier's Check. But all Fulton Bank is ... they have this money in there and their holding it out of your account until they ...
[Stan J. Caterbone] I don’t have an account there, I never had an account there. (Regarding Cashier's Check)
[Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] You never had an account there?
[Stan J. Caterbone] It’s the proceeds from a real estate sale.
[Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] O.K. so were talking about 2 to 3 business days.
[Stan J. Caterbone] What is a Cashier's Check?
[Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] A Cashier's Check is just a … it used to mean it was like cash. no more it’s like that.
[Stan J. Caterbone] Well it’s still like cash because there is no account. I have no account. It is not drawn on an account.
[Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] It is drawn on an account. It’s drawn on the house account. You got a house sale right? So it is drawn on that account. It is drawn on that house.
[Stan J. Caterbone] No, it is not. No because I traded, I swapped Cashier's Checks.
[Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] So you swapped Cashier's Checks?
[Stan J. Caterbone] Yea.
[Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] It is still going to take 2 to 3 days.
[Stan J. Caterbone] But there is no account. I never had an account there.
[Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] So what was the Cashier's Check from?
[Stan J. Caterbone] Fulton Bank. Does it matter? Does it matter?
[Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] Hum.
[Stan J. Caterbone] Does it matter?
[Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] Oh it doesn’t matter cause.
[Stan J. Caterbone] O.K. what is a Cashier's Check?
[Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] It is still going to take 2 to 3 days.
[Stan J. Caterbone] I know but I’m trying to determine I’m trying to ask you what a Cashier's Check is.
[Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] A Cashier's Check is Basically a check, basically a check.
[Stan J. Caterbone] It is a guaranteed check.
[Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] It is only guaranteed if you are going to get it, so we have to hold it for 2 or 3 days. That is if Wachovia does get it.
[Stan J. Caterbone] What do you mean if Wachovia gets it.
[Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] That’s if we are going to get it.
[Stan J. Caterbone] What would make you not get it? The only thing that could make you not get it is if ...
[Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] They (Fulton Bank) may not honor it.
[Stan J. Caterbone] They (Fulton Bank) have to honor it. It’s a Cashier's Check.
[Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] They (Fulton Bank) don’t have to honor it. They (Fulton Bank) don’t have to honor that check. I have seen that happen before.
[Stan J. Caterbone] Why, how can they (Fulton Bank) steal a Cashier’s Check?
[Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] It is not really stealing a Cashiers Check. Let’s say something was wrong or you know they didn’t want to honor the check or then it has to come back down to us, and then we can’t take it.
[Stan J. Caterbone] They (Fulton Bank) can’t do that on a Cashier's Check.
[Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] They (Fulton Bank) can do it.
3:35 [Stan J. Caterbone] How can they (Fulton Bank) do it? How can they (Fulton Bank) do that?
[Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] It’s up to the bank’s rules. Certain banks have certain policies.
[Stan J. Caterbone] For what?
[Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] If I were to make up the policies.
[Stan J. Caterbone] How do you buy a Cashier’s Check? You have to have guaranteed funds to buy a Cashier’s Check. The funds are already guaranteed. You can’t revert it back to an un guaranteed … to an unsecured document.
[Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] It’s like when someone comes in here with a Cashier’s Check from Ohio, they don’t have to guarantee it. They could not honor it.
[Stan J. Caterbone] Well sure the bank could be closed (shut down).
[Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] So, that’s why we have to have a 2-3 day hold.
[Stan J. Caterbone] You mean I can’t buy another Cashier’s Check from you?
[Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] Now you could once the money is available. Once the funds are available you could buy a Cashier’s Check. That’s what you could do.
[Stan J. Caterbone] Where did you get this definition of a Cashier’s Check?
[Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] A Cashier’s Check isn’t always guarunteed.
[Stan J. Caterbone] That wouldn’t be a Cashier’s Check then.
[Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] Some Cashier’s Checks are fraudulent and they need to …
[Stan J. Caterbone] Of course, if it is a fraud (laugh).
[Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] It would still be a Cashier’s Check. Right, you still have to go through Fulton Bank, you still have to file the check and wait 2-3 days.
[Stan J. Caterbone] I did not like your explanation for a Cashier’s Check that they can hold that check, and they can’t.
[Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] Well they can. Wachovia can. They can hold the check.
[Stan J. Caterbone] How can they hold my check?
[Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] You see whenever they deposit a check …
[Stan J. Caterbone] No. You said Fulton could not pay it.
[Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] Ya, Fulton could not pay it. Fulton could say we are not going to pay that check.
[Stan J. Caterbone] How can they not pay that check?
[Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] They can do that. It’s a Cashier’s Check.
[Stan J. Caterbone] No they can’t.
[Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] Yes they can. That is up to them. Wachovia rules are like this. Once we deposit that check, it takes 2-3 business days.
[Stan J. Caterbone] You were citing Fulton Bank rules.
[Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] Yea, Fulton does not have to honor that check.
[Stan J. Caterbone] Sure they do, it’s a Cashier’s Check.
[Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] They don’t. That is something you are going to have to ask Fulton.
[Stan J. Caterbone] Why are you saying they don’t have to honor it?
[Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] Because they don’t. It’s like walking in with a regular check.
[Stan J. Caterbone] On it’s not. A Cashier’s Check is already guaranteed. That’s how you get a Cashier’s Check. You have to have guaranteed funds. You have to confirm the guaranteed funds or else it would not be a Cashier’s Check.
[Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] It, still sometimes it is denied.
[Stan J. Caterbone] How?
[Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] They don’t have to honor it.
[Stan J. Caterbone] How?
[Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] I don’t know how Fulton does it, but sometimes they just don’t honor it.
[Stan J. Caterbone] How can they not honor a Cashiers Check?
[Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] They don’t have to honor it. It is up to that bank not to honor it.
[Stan J. Caterbone] No it’s not. That would be breaking the law.
[Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] No, not necessarily.
[Stan J. Caterbone] Unless it was fraudulent.
[Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] You are going to have to put the check in and wait 2-3 business days. So if you go 2-3 business days starting today, you go Monday, cause Monday would be 2 business days.
[Stan J. Caterbone] I though you said next day.
[Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] We could put it in next day ticket. We could do that for you.
[Stan J. Caterbone] So how does a next-day ticket work?
[Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] The next-day ticket gives you funds availability the next business day. The next business day.
[Stan J. Caterbone] So, I would have $17,000 available the next day?
[Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] You got it.
[Stan J. Caterbone] And how much can I use today?
[Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] Um, I have to take it up to the teller and see what they can give you back.
[Stan J. Caterbone] I just want it in my account.
[Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] You want to put all of it in your account?
[Stan J. Caterbone] Yea.
[Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] O.K. we can do that. Just take it up to the teller.
[Stan J. Caterbone] I have a couple of questions before we do this.
[Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] O.K.
[Stan J. Caterbone] What’s my account balance?
[Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] Your account balance is $1.50.
[Stan J. Caterbone] O.K. what if I use $ .85 cents of that today? How is that going to work?
[Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] You would withdraw $ .85 cents?
[Stan J. Caterbone] No, if I use my bank card for $ .85 cents?
[Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] It’s going to come out $ .85 cents.
[Stan J. Caterbone] What is my balance going to be?
[Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] $ .65 cents.
[Stan J. Caterbone] Then what happens?
[Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] You would have $.65 cents available.
[Stan J. Caterbone] Then what happens?
[Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] You mean with the Check?
[Stan J. Caterbone] No, I would have $ .65 cents in there, then you would overdraft me.
[Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] No.
[Stan J. Caterbone] Then why did you overdraft me last month (August) when I a had $20 cents balance? I had a $ .20 cent balance and you overdraft me. Go look at my statement. There was a charge of $5.95 in my account, that left $ .20 cents and you overdraft me $35.00.
[Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] There was $5.15 in your account. You bought something from Marion Courtroom for $3.95. Then you also purchased something from Lancaster Newspapers for $4.95 cents.
[Stan J. Caterbone] No. No. Look the statement. Your Wrong. My statement says otherwise.
[Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] This is your account (on computer screen). $4.95. Then on the 13th (August) …
[Stan J. Caterbone] No that’s wrong – Go look at my statement.
[Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] Your wrong. This is the statement. You made a deposit on the 18th (August).
[Stan J. Caterbone] I got the statement. There’s a .20 cent balance left after the $5.15. That was Friday night after the deposit left $ .20 cents. Marion Court was on the 15th (August). I made a deposit on Friday.
[Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] Your wrong. This is the statement (computer screen), you made a deposit on the 18th.
[Stan J. Caterbone] No, I made a deposit on the 15th at 4:00pm. She cashed the check.
[Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] I’m telling you it did not come through that way.
[Stan J. Caterbone] Well there’s a $ .20 balance on my statement. After the $5.15, after the Lancaster Newspaper. That left $ .20 cent balance in my account. That Marion Court was on Friday night. That did not hit until the 18 th (August). I’m telling you that is wrong.
[Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] $4.95, Now that is wrong. Sir, I’m going off what this says.
[Stan J. Caterbone] Well, I’m telling you that is wrong.
[Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] This is why you got the overdraft.
[Stan J. Caterbone] How?
[Wachovia Bank Branch Manager]The way I’m looking at it you had $5.15.
[Stan J. Caterbone] After the $5.15 I had $ .20 cents.
[Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] This is the $4.95
[Stan J. Caterbone] I had $ .15 cents ($ .20) in my account. I wwent to yiour teller and I said I need these funds available for the weekend. Here is a check for $50.00 from a District Magistrate (Refund for Driving Under Suspension Charge by Pennsylvania State Police that was dismissed). Why weren’t they available?
[Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] The funds weren’t available until the 18th.
[Stan J. Caterbone] She (Wachovia Bank Teller) told me they would be available for the weekend. (I would have just cashed the check and used the cash for the weekend if Wachovia would not have lied)
[Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] If you deposited cash they would not be available till Monday (August 18th). Your talking about…
[Stan J. Caterbone] So what happened?
[Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] They would not be available till the 18th.
[Stan J. Caterbone] I showed her (Wachovia Bank Teller). I said I want to use these funds for the weekend. I .. Here is what happened. First I deposited the check. I said now wait. I don’t want to do that. I need these funds for the weekend. There was another woman in line. (I waited until she was done with her transaction). I went back, she did it over. She deposited the cash so I could use the card (Debit Check Card) for the weekend. Plus, it had a $.20 balance in it.
[Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] You overdrafted.
[Stan J. Caterbone] She said that I could use the card for the weekend.
[Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] The was it’s on the system here, it says $5.15 on the 12th, so if you…
[Stan J. Caterbone] No, that was automatic (Lancaster Newspaper). There was $ .20 cents after that.
[Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] So. But the $5 on the 15th came through.
[Stan J. Caterbone] What came through?
[Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] Marion Court.
[Stan J. Caterbone] That was not until Friday night, after I made the deposit.
[Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] That too was on the 18th.
[Stan J. Caterbone] No, that was on the 15th.
[Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] That came through on the 18th.
[Stan J. Caterbone] No it didn’t. Your wrong. Why did the send me a different transaction sheet (Monthly Wachovia Bank Statement)? Did you look at the online statement and the paper statement? There was a $ .20 cent balance.
[Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] I’m looking at it here (computer screen).
[Stan J. Caterbone] Well, somebody is lying.
[Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] Give me a second. (long pause)
[Stan J. Caterbone] Listen Sir.
[Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] Look here.
[Stan J. Caterbone] No, I have my statements. She (Wachovia Bank Teller) me I could use the card. Somebody lied to me.
[Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] I don’t know how it came in, but you have an overdraft.
[Stan J. Caterbone] Somebody lied to me. Somebody’s lying.